Sowing date and maize grain quality for dry milling

GAMBIN, BRENDA L.; GAMBIN, BRENDA L.; BORRÁS, LUCAS; BORRÁS, LUCAS; ABDALA, LUCAS; ABDALA, LUCAS

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV

Lugar: Amsterdam; Año: 2018 vol. 92 p. 1 - 8

1161-0301

Argentina is the single exporter of non-gmo hard endosperm maize to the European Union, and is internationally known for its grain hardness. This special hard endosperm maize supply chain follows strict regulations to ensure a high quality grain. Specific values for test weight, flotation index, grain vitreousness, and screen retention are demanded by the dry milling industry. Central temperate Argentinean production system is currently changing to later sowings, and there is limited information on the effect of contrasting sowing dates over specific grain quality attributes of interest for the industry. In this study we explored the effects of delaying maize sowing dates from September-October to December on maize dry milling grain quality in the central temperate area. Eighteen commercial genotypes differing in grain hardness were sown during two growing seasons and two sowing dates. Measured traits were grain yield, individual grain weight, dry milling quality (test weight, floaters, vitreousness, 8 mm screen retention), and composition (oil, protein, starch). Grain yield varied significantly among genotypes (p < 0.001), and semi-dents showed higher yields when compared to hard endosperm flints (13 110 and 11 463 kg ha−1, respectively). Early and late sown maize yielded 12 737 kg ha−1 and 11 003 kg ha−1, respectively. Significant genotype differences were observed for all grain quality and composition attributes. Delaying the sowing date from September-October to December had minimum effects on physical grain quality traits, onlyevident at some genotypes (significant sowing date x genotype interaction for most traits). Genotype to genotype differences in grain quality and composition were larger than variations between sowing dates. Grain hardness was strongly determined by the genotype, making genotype selection a critical management option for attaining high quality at any sowing date. It is evident that high dry milling quality can be obtained with adequate genotypes also at later sowings.