Dialéctica de Paradigmas dentro de la Teoría Evolutiva. ¿Pudo acaso la vida tener origen en un Universo Holístico?

GARRO. H. A.

Fundamentos en Humanidades

Nueva Editorial Universitaria, UNSL

Lugar: San Luis; Año: 2010 vol. 21 p. 153 - 176

1515-4467

Displaying the observer as part of the observed is also impossible to separate “inert” of the “live”. Prigogine, like Bohm, think in which the emergence of life is not a random combination of molecules, but it appears inevitable from the order multidimensional of the Universe. Traditionally, scientists have believed that there is a hierarchy of explanations for the universe. As the evolution occurs more complex dissipative structures appear to bring new levels and new laws whit hers. Instead of having levels in a hierarchy we should initiate a dialectic. According to the neodarwinism through the course of history new biological forms arise as a result of the fight for survival among individuals. The doctrine of survival of the fittest seems to imply progress. Darwin supported the idea of evolution as hierarchical, unlike Wallace thought that evolution as a process that constantly produced new varieties and species, with no element is greater than or "more evolved" than others. The notion of a socialist order and non-hierarchical level where no more fundamental or higher than for many others is almost as bizarre as the idea of whole, perhaps whole is not hierarchical. The coevolution is the focus dissipative structure of the origin of species. Considers neodarwinismo as limited address the changing biological forms. The development of structures in what is called microevolution reflects the development of structures of macroevolution, and vice versa, these different structures to evolve together.