MACNBR   00242
MUSEO ARGENTINO DE CIENCIAS NATURALES "BERNARDINO RIVADAVIA"
Unidad Ejecutora - UE
artículos
Título:
Big, bad, and beautiful: phylogenetic relationships of the horned frogs (Anura: Ceratophryidae)
Autor/es:
FAIVOVICH, J.; NICOLI, L.; BLOTTO, B. L.; PEREYRA, M.O.; BALDO, D.; BARRIONUEVO, J.S.; FABREZI, M.; WILD, E.R.; HADDAD, C.F.B
Revista:
South American Journal of Herpetology
Editorial:
Sociedade Brasileira de Herpetologia
Referencias:
Año: 2014 vol. 9 p. 207 - 207
ISSN:
1808-9798
Resumen:
The The horned frog family, Ceratophryidae, currently comprises three genera and 12 extant species, distributed from the Caribbeanlowlands to the Pampean grasslands. Horned frogs are fossorial species that are remarkable in terms of their adult and larval morphology,karyotype, behavior, and other aspects of their biology. In this paper we present a molecular phylogenetic analysis with the goals of: (1) exploringthe relationships among the species of Ceratophryidae; (2) studying the evolution of polyploidy; (3) studying the evolution of cocoonformation and larval development duration associated with surviving in semiarid environments; and (4) reviewing the ceratophryid fossilrecord that could be relevant as calibration points in molecular divergence estimations. The analysis included 11 of the 12 extant species and,when possible, multiple exemplars per species, as well as multiple outgroups. Sequence data were obtained on seven mitochondrial and sixnuclear genes for up to 8200 bp per specimen. Our results indicate that the individual monophyly of Ceratophrys and Lepidobatrachus is wellcorroborated. The monotypic Chacophrys is recovered as the sister taxon of Lepidobatrachus, but with Jackknife frequency < 50%. Lepidobatrachusasper is the sister taxon of L. laevis + L. llanensis. Relationships within Ceratophrys are congruent with an earlier proposal, with a cladecomposed of the species possessing a dorsal bony shield (Ce. aurita, Ce. cranwelli, Ce. joazeirensis, and Ce. ornata), and another clade composedof Ce. stolzmanni, Ce. calcarata, and Ce. cornuta. Unlike earlier proposals, the octoploid species (Ce. aurita, Ce. joazeirensis, and Ce. ornata) arenot monophyletic, as the diploid Ce. cranwelli, and Ce. ornata are sister taxa. This result implies an ambiguous optimization of ploidy levels,with either a single origin of octoploidy with a subsequent reversal to diploidy, or two independent origins of octoploidy being equallyparsimonious; both alternatives are quite unusual from the perspective of chromosome evolution. Our results suggest that ceratophryidsdiversified in semiarid environments and three independent events resulted in three species subsequently occupying temperate or tropicalhumid areas. This early diversification in semiarid areas explains the retention of characteristics associated with these environments (likethe production of a cocoon of dead skin during estivation, and possibly an accelerated larval period and development) in species present inhumid areas. A revision of the fossil record of this family of frogs indicates that there are only two fossil remains that could serve as calibrationpoints for molecular clock estimation, but a number of issues associated with them preclude their use.