INVESTIGADORES
VARGAS evelyn teresita
congresos y reuniones científicas
Título:
?'half-ironically, half-defiantly?' Peirce on Irony and Inference
Autor/es:
VARGAS, EVELYN
Lugar:
Madrid
Reunión:
Simposio; After Irony. Discourse, Ethics and Politics in a Precarious Age; 2015
Resumen:
<!-- /* Font Definitions */@font-face{font-family:"ＭＳ 明朝";mso-font-charset:78;mso-generic-font-family:auto;mso-font-pitch:variable;mso-font-signature:-536870145 1791491579 18 0 131231 0;}@font-face{font-family:"Cambria Math";panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;mso-font-charset:0;mso-generic-font-family:auto;mso-font-pitch:variable;mso-font-signature:-536870145 1107305727 0 0 415 0;}@font-face{font-family:Cambria;panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;mso-font-charset:0;mso-generic-font-family:auto;mso-font-pitch:variable;mso-font-signature:-536870145 1073743103 0 0 415 0;} /* Style Definitions */p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal{mso-style-unhide:no;mso-style-qformat:yes;mso-style-parent:"";margin:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;mso-pagination:widow-orphan;font-size:12.0pt;font-family:Cambria;mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria;mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-fareast-font-family:"ＭＳ 明朝";mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria;mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;}.MsoChpDefault{mso-style-type:export-only;mso-default-props:yes;font-family:Cambria;mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria;mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-fareast-font-family:"ＭＳ 明朝";mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria;mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;}@page WordSection1{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;margin:70.85pt 3.0cm 70.85pt 3.0cm;mso-header-margin:36.0pt;mso-footer-margin:36.0pt;mso-paper-source:0;}div.WordSection1{page:WordSection1;}-->My purpose in this talk is to present Peirce?s semioticapproach to irony and analyse whether his view can offer a unifying accountthat could be applied to all forms of irony and provide a better understandingof its evaluative dimension.As I expect to show , if my reading of irony as an acriticalinference is plausible, it can be extended to other forms of irony sincesemiotic analysis is not limited to verbal expressions and to ironic playbeyond hostility and contempt to cover interplay that ranges in tone fromhostile to sympathetic. But the indeterminacy of ironic inferences is alsocapable of accounting for irony as a powerful instrument to avoid censorship.Peirce?s late theory of the interpretant can account for a multi-dimensionalmodel that opens the way to the the interpreter to share the ironist'sperspective.
