Population pharmacokinetics of amikacin in patients with pediatric cystic fibrosis

CACERES GUIDO, PAULO; PEREZ, MARIEL; HALAC, ALICIA; FERRARI, MARIELA; IBARRA, MANUEL; LICCIARDONE, NIEVES; CASTAÑOS, CLAUDIO; GRAVINA, LUIS P.; JIMENEZ, CRISTINA; GARCIA BOURNISSEN, FACUNDO; SCHAIQUEVICH, PAULA

PEDIATRIC PULMONOLOGY

WILEY-LISS, DIV JOHN WILEY & SONS INC

Año: 2019 vol. 54 p. 1801 - 1810

8755-6863

Introduction: Amikacin is commonly used in patients with pediatric cystic fibrosis (CF) for the treatment of pulmonary exacerbations. Amikacin efficacy is related to maximum plasma concentration/minimum inhibitory concentration (Cmax/MIC) ratio >8. Pharmacokinetic data in patients with pediatric CF are scarce. The aim of this study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model describing amikacin disposition in patients with pediatric CF. Methods: CF patients under 18 years of age with pulmonary exacerbation who received amikacin were enrolled. Patients received different amikacin regimens (30 mg−1 kg−1 day−1 every 8, 12, or 24 hours) depending on the patient´s status and hospital protocols. Amikacin serum levels were obtained for therapeutic drug monitoring. PopPK model was developed using MONOLIX Suite-2018R1 (Lixoft). Results: A total of 39 patients (114 amikacin concentrations) were included in this study. Population estimates for the elimination rate constant (k) and the volume of distribution (V) were 0.541 hours−1 and 0.451 L/kg, respectively. Between-subject and between-occasion variability were 53% and 16.5% for k and 31% and 22% for V, respectively. Bodyweight was a significant covariate associated with V. Based on simulations, almost 70% of the patients receiving 30 mg−1 kg−1 day−1 every 24 hours would achieve a Cmax/MIC ratio >8 which is an appropriate therapeutic goal while no patient in the other two groups (Q8 and Q12) would achieve that objective. Conclusions: The regimen of 30 mg−1 kg−1 day−1 every 24 hours more adequately fulfilled the therapeutic target for amikacin. Although all our patients had good clinical results and a good adverse-events profile, further studies are necessary to redefine the optimal treatment strategy.