Top‑down modulation impairs priming susceptibility in complex decision‑making with social implications

FRANCO AGUSTIN BERNAL; TOMAS ALVES SALGUEIRO; AXEL BRZOSTOWSKI; EMILIO RECART; AYELÉN CARAMÉS; JUAN MANUEL PEREZ; DAMIAN FURMAN; MARTIN GRAZIANO; P. N. FERNÁNDEZ LARROSA

Scientific Reports

Nature Research journals

Año: 2022

2045-2322

Could social context variables prime complex decisions? Could top‑down processes impair this priming susceptibility? Complex decisions have been mainly studied from economic and moral perspectives, and Dual Process Theories provide evidence of how these processes could be affected. To address these issues from a political perspective, online experiments were conducted. Participants (n = 252) were asked to choose a face from 4 options, each associated with different frequencies (repetition priming) or with phrases with different emotional valence (emotional priming), for an unspecified task (UST group) or an important task (IMT group). The most repeated face was chosen most in the UST group, and was associated with lower response times. Positive faces were equally chosen by both groups. To compare results in a more ecological situation, a social study was conducted during the 2019 Argentine Presidential Election, including online surveys (n = 3673) and analysis of news media mentioning candidates. The familiarity and trust to each candidate explained the voting‑probability for most of them, as well as correlated with their frequency of mentions in the news, their positive associations, and election results. Our results suggest complex decision‑making is susceptible to priming, depending on top‑down modulation.