Acoustic telemetry and accelerometers: a field comparison of different proxies for activity in the marine environment

JOSÉ MANUEL PEREÑÍGUEZ; LEONARDO A. VENERUS; CAYETANO GUTIÉRREZ-CÁNOVAS; DAVID ABECASIS; JAVIER E. CIANCIO; PEDRO GIMÉNEZ-MONTALBÁN; GARCÍA-CHARTON, JOSÉ A.

ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE

OXFORD UNIV PRESS

Lugar: Oxford; Año: 2022

1054-3139

Different proxies for activity are used in the field of acoustic telemetry, a leading technology for the study of behaviour in the aquatic environment. Acoustic telemetry poses some shortcomings that may condition data interpretation. Here, we assessed some approaches commonly used to infer activity from acoustic telemetry data using acceleration biologgers as a benchmark. Specifically, we assessed (1) the performance of internal acceleration transmitters, (2) the consequences of averaging acceleration data into increasing time bins, (3) the occurrence of sampling bias in telemetry data acquisition, and (4) the performance of the number of detections and the depth range as proxies for activity. Despite some constraints of acoustic telemetry, acceleration transmitters had a good performance. Conversely, the number of detections and the depth range did not match well the activity estimates provided by acceleration biologgers. Besides, our results pointed to some issues in models concerning the predictive power of acceleration transmitters (linear predictor) over acceleration biologgers, warned about potential sampling bias associated with data acquisition with acoustic telemetry, and highlighted the relevance of considering inter-individual differences in behavioural studies. Finally, we provided some methodological perspectives that should be considered to plan fieldwork, analyse data, and interpret results on animal activity obtained with acoustic telemetry.