Intercomparison of ground-based microwave remote sensing measurements of stratospheric ozone over the Mendoza region, Argentina with Haloe data.

PULIAFITO, CARLOS MARIO; PULIAFITO, ENRIQUE

REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT

Pergamon, Elsevier Science Ltd.

Año: 2005 vol. 94 p. 61 - 82

0034-4257

The Tropospheric Water Vapour and Stratospheric Ozone (TROPWA) project has measured ground-based stratospheric ozone by means of millimetre wave radiometry tunned at 142 GHz from 1993 to 2000 at Mendoza, Argentina. Additionally tropospheric water vapour was measured using a 92 GHz radiometer. This paper presents the theoretical error analysis used to characterize the ozone instrument, and a comparison study of the retrieved profiles with coincident measurements from different instruments. To evaluate and validate the retrieved stratospheric ozone profiles, we used a set of ozone profiles measured by the Halogen Occultation Experiment (HALOE); while the water vapour data was calibrated against a set of three years of radiosounding balloon data taken by the Argentine National Weather Service. This study also includes a comparison of individual ozone profiles measured using a second ground-based millimetre wave radiometer-spectrometer tuned at 276 GHz from the Max-Planck-Institut für Aeronomie (MPAE), Germany. During this particular campaign in Nov., 1994, the ground based measurements were contrasted with two space-born experiments: the Millimetre Wave Atmospheric Sounder (MAS), flown in the NASA-ATLAS 3 mission, and the above mentioned HALOE. From the error analysis and the comparison tests follows that between 20 to 40 km the TROPWA instrument is able to retrieve ozone profiles with absolute errors varying from 10 to 20 %, relative errors less than 5%, and with a height resolution, calculated as full width at half maximum (FWHM), varying from 5 to 11 km depending on the altitude. The mayor discrepancies between the various set of profiles are about +8 to ?10% (+0.4 to ?0.8 ppmv), mainly due to the coarser height resolution of our instrument. Keywords: Atmosphere; Stratospheric ozone; Ground-based; Radiometry; Comparison; Validation