Constraining depositional evolution and reservoir compartmentalization in a mixed carbonate-siliciclastic lacustrine system: The Yacoraite formation, Salta Group, NW Argentina

MUTTI, MARIA; VALLATI, MICHELE; TOMÁS, SARA; GALLI, CLAUDIA; BAHNIUK RUMBELSPERGER, ANELIZE MANUELA; MAERZ, SVEN; COIRA, BEATRIZ

MARINE AND PETROLEUM GEOLOGY

ELSEVIER SCI LTD

Año: 2022 vol. 149 p. 1 - 22

0264-8172

The mixed carbonate-siliciclastic Yacoraite Formation, Salta Group in northern Argentina has been interest of recent studies searching for potential analogues for the South Atlantic pre-sal carbonates. Microbial lacustrine carbonates are important reservoir systems and their characteristics and stratigraphic packaging are a major factor impacting compartmentalization. This study provides sedimentological and facies analyses combined with petrographical, isotope geochemical and petrophysical analyses of lacustrine clastics and carbonates using an example from the Yacoraite Formation (Salta Group) in northern Argentina (Tres Cruces sub-basin). The Yacoraite Formation records the evolution of a lacustrine system responding to basin scale tectonic processes and climatic conditions and is interpreted as a microbially-related mixed carbonate clastic lacustrine system comprising 8 main Facies types, deposited in either a perennial or an ephemeral system. The most dominant architectural elements are: Sandstones with interbedded shales (F1), Shales with interbedded sandstones and siltstones (F2), Thick-bedded oolitic grainstone (F5), Thin-bedded oolitic grainstone-packstone (F6) and Stromatolite boundstone (F8). These facies types allow to differentiate two types of lacustrine environments: Perennial (Stage I) vs Ephemeral (Stage II) intercalated with episodes of continental plains deposition, arranged in three depositional sequences (Yacoraite I, II and III), each recording either transgressive or a regressivetransgressive trend. Carbonate and clastics are arranged in cycles during the Perennial l Stage suggesting that the depositional system responded in patterns attributable to reciprocal sedimentation, whereas, during the Ephemeral Stage 2, spatial coexistence of clastic and carbonate seem to be the case rather that cyclic vertical superposition. Thick-bedded oolitic grainstone and Stromatolites (F5 and F8 respectively) of the perennial lacustrine system show laterally continuous and thick beds with the best reservoir properties. Furthermore, the Sandstones with interbedded shales (F1) are characterized by intermediate values of porosity and permeability, which would not result in permeability barriers. On the other hand, Thin-bedded oolitic grainstone-packstone (F6) of the ephemeral lacustrine system are characterized by a high degree of heterogeneity due to their limited areal distribution and their complex spatial variability with Shales with interbedded sandstones and siltstones (F2).