Correction: Evidence of hybridization between wild boars and feral pigs (Sus scrofa) from Argentina: implications for the success of the invasion process (Biological Invasions, (2023), 10.1007/s10530-023-03173-6)

ACOSTA, DIANA BELÉN; FIGUEROA, CARLOS EZEQUIEL; FERNÁNDEZ, GABRIELA PAULA; MAC ALLISTER, MATIAS EXEQUIEL; CARPINETTI, BRUNO NICOLÁS; PEREZ-GIANMARCO, LUCILA; MERINO, MARIANO LISANDRO

BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS

SPRINGER

Lugar: Berlin; Año: 2023 vol. 26 p. 385 - 398

1387-3547

In Table 2 of this article, some of the data were incorrectly published with blank space. All blank space should be replaced with periods. In Table 3 of this article, the numbers under the column N, NA, NE were incorrectly published with commas. All commas in the numbers should be replaced with decimal points. The corrected Table 2 and 3 are given below. (Table presented.) (Table presented.) Nucleotide diversity sites for the 28 CR haplotypes obtained in this study. Numbers indicate variable nucleotide position and dots indicate base equality. Additionally, the number of individuals of each haplotype is shown Haplotypes Nucleotide positions Number of individuals 33 66 88 95 103 110 116 124 132 137 160 220 258 273 285 288 302 307 369 378 384 418 429 430 431 432 433 435 436 440 H1 A – T A T G C C C A T T T A C G C A C T T C C A C C T A A – 51 H2. – C C A A – T T G C C. G T. T. T..... – 1 H3. –. C............. – 1 H4. –. C A.... C. T.. G..... – 1 H5. –. A.... C. T....... – 22 H6. –. C A.... C. T....... – 8 H7. –..... C........ – 11 H8. –. C.... C........ – 2 H9. –. C.... C... G..... – 1 H10. –.............. C 10 H11. C.............. – 9 H12. –. A.... C. T....... C 3 H13. – C. A A – T T G C C. G T. T. T..... – 7 H14. – C. A A – T T G. C C G T. T. T. C.... – 2 H15. – C. A A – T T G C C C G T. T. T..... – 1 H16. – C. A A – T T G. C. G T. T. T..... – 1 H17. –....... T. C...... – 1 H18 C C.............. – 1 H19. –.......... A T C A G G C C C 5 H20 C –. A.... C. T....... – 1 H21. T. A.... C. T........ 5 H22 C –.............. 2 H23. – C. A A – T T G. C. G T. T...... – 1 H24. –. A.... C.. T...... – 2 H25. C..... C........ – 1 H26. –. C... C. C........ – 1 H27. T..... C........ – 1 H28. –.... C. C........ – 1 Total 153 Diversity indices calculated for each microsatellite locus N NA NE Nrare HO HE FWright SW632 22 8 3.585 3 0.636 0.721 0.117 S0155 22 7 2.907 2 0.636 0.656 0.03 S0226 22 9 3.767 3 0.545 0.735 0.257 SW936 19 7 4.102 3 0.579 0.756 0.234 S0026 16 5 1.947 1 0.625 0.486 0.285 SWr1941 16 7 2.599 2 0.563 0.615 0.086 Media 19.5 7.167 3.151 – 0.597 0.662 0.073 SE 1.204 0.543 0.331 – 0.016 0.041 0.08 N average number of samples included in the analyses, NA number of alleles per locus, NE effective number of alleles per locus, NRARE number of rare alleles per locus, HO observed heterozygosity, HE expected heterozygosity, FWright wright fixation index The original article has been corrected.