Redefining Territorial Scales and the Strategic Role of Spatial Planning
DANIEL GALLAND; PABLO ELINBAUM
disP - The Planning Review
Routledge - Taylor & Francis
Lugar: Zürich; Año: 2015 vol. 51 p. 70 - 88
This paper argues that spatial planning systems tend to redefine and reinterpret conventional territorial scales through the dual adoption and articulation of legal instruments and spatial strategies at different levels of planning administration. In depicting such redefinition, this paper delves into the cases of Denmark and Catalonia through an analysis concerned with: i) the strategic spatial role attributed to each level of planning; and ii) the redefinition of territorial scales as a result of changing political objectives and spatial relationships occurring between planning levels. The assessment pertaining to the strategic roles of spatial planning instruments as well as the evolving redefinition of territorial scales in both Denmark and Catalonia suggests that the conventional, hierarchical "cascade-shaped" ideal of policy implementation is superseded. While both cases tend to converge in their alignment with strategic spatial planning, the implications stemming from rescaling processes radically diverge, as illustrated by the opposing fates of the regional scale and the distinctive means to reassure a "vertical spatial anchor" for the stability and permanence of power structures.