INVESTIGADORES
DIMITRIU Cristian
congresos y reuniones científicas
Título:
Rawls and a Global Difference Principle
Autor/es:
CRISTIAN DIMITRIU
Lugar:
Montreal, Canada
Reunión:
Conferencia; Concordia Graduate Conference; 2007
Institución organizadora:
Concordia University - Department of Philosophy
Resumen:
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;
mso-font-charset:0;
mso-generic-font-family:roman;
mso-font-pitch:variable;
mso-font-signature:-1610611985 1107304683 0 0 159 0;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{mso-style-unhide:no;
mso-style-qformat:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";
mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-ansi-language:EN-US;
mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
p.MsoBodyText, li.MsoBodyText, div.MsoBodyText
{mso-style-unhide:no;
mso-style-link:"Body Text Char";
margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
text-align:justify;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";
mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-ansi-language:ES-AR;
mso-fareast-language:EN-US;
mso-bidi-font-style:italic;
mso-no-proof:yes;}
span.BodyTextChar
{mso-style-name:"Body Text Char";
mso-style-unhide:no;
mso-style-locked:yes;
mso-style-link:"Body Text";
mso-ansi-font-size:12.0pt;
mso-bidi-font-size:12.0pt;
mso-ansi-language:ES-AR;
mso-fareast-language:EN-US;
mso-bidi-font-style:italic;
mso-no-proof:yes;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
mso-default-props:yes;
font-size:10.0pt;
mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;
mso-header-margin:36.0pt;
mso-footer-margin:36.0pt;
mso-paper-source:0;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
-->
ABSTRACT. In this paper I will analyze John
Rawlss claims against an international difference principle and some of the
problems implied by his reasoning, as presented in The Law of Peoples. I
argue that these claims are inconsistent with the difference principle itself.
If we accept them, then we will face the dilemma of either having to endorse
this principle both in the domestic and the international domains or having to
reject it completely. I also defend the view that Rawlss possible reply to
this objection relies on a dubious empirical premise.
