INVESTIGADORES
DIMITRIU Cristian
congresos y reuniones científicas
Título:
Free trade and Exploitation
Autor/es:
CRISTIAN DIMITRIU
Lugar:
Vancouver, Canada
Reunión:
Conferencia; CANADIAN PHILOSOPHICAL ASSOCIATION; 2008
Institución organizadora:
CANADIAN PHILOSOPHICAL ASSOCIATION
Resumen:
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;
mso-font-charset:1;
mso-generic-font-family:roman;
mso-font-format:other;
mso-font-pitch:variable;
mso-font-signature:0 0 0 0 0 0;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{mso-style-unhide:no;
mso-style-qformat:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";
mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
mso-default-props:yes;
font-size:10.0pt;
mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 90.0pt 72.0pt 90.0pt;
mso-header-margin:35.4pt;
mso-footer-margin:35.4pt;
mso-paper-source:0;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
-->
Proposals are coercive when
somebody is made worse off relative to a normative baseline. In this paper, I
shall analyze Thomas Pogges suggestion that, insofar as the normative baseline
of basic human rights is violated, trade agreements among developed and
developing countries usually involve coercion. I will argue that his argument,
as presented, is not compelling enough to make the case for coercion. I
propose, instead, that we should understand trade agreements as cases of
mutually advantageous exploitation.
