[ARTÍCULO] Observaciones sobre el recurso retórico de la feminización en la invectiva ciceroniana

MARÍA EMILIA CAIRO

Ciceroniana On Line

Société Internationale des Amis de Cicéron, Centro di Studi Ciceroniani

Lugar: Roma (Italia) - París (Francia); Año: 2024 vol. 8

In Cicero´s texts we find frequent reflections about what it means to be Roman, through statements about this identity. These definitions about “Romanness” are complemented by other statements related to the “non-Roman”: identity is also configured by opposition, pointing out those features that exclude an individual from the group. This kind of statement is found in the invective speeches in which Cicero attacks an adversary and accuses him, among other things, of not being a true Roman and not exhibiting the characteristic features of that identity. In this paper, we will analize the topic of feminization, consisting of attacking and disqualifying the (male) adversary by pointing out feminine behaviours. Feminization places the target of the attack in a place of political, social and moral weakness – it can no longer adequately play its role in the res publica. Likewise, the adversary is marked as a dangerous individual, subject to unbridled appetites at odds with the “normal” behaviour expected of a Roman citizen. We will consider passages from the invectives against Verres (70 BC), from the speech in gratitude to the Senate upon his return from exile (57 BC), from De haruspicum responso (56 BC), from the defences of Sestius (56 BC) and Milo (52 BC), and the second Philippic (44 BC), in order to analyze examples of the use of this topic throughout the entire career of our speaker.