New remains of Cephalomys arcidens (Rodentia, Caviomorpha) and a redefinition of the enigmatic Cephalomyidae

BUSKER, FELIPE; DOZO, MARÍA TERESA; SOTO, IGNACIO MARÍA

JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC PALAEONTOLOGY

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS

Lugar: Cambridge; Año: 2020 p. 1 - 41

1477-2019

Cephalomys is the best-known cephalomyid, recorded in five localities in Argentina and known from well-preserved mandibles, fragments of skull, and a large number of isolated teeth, from both juveniles and adults. Despite this, a modern description is lacking and the validity of some species of Cephalomys has been questioned in the last few years. New material from the Deseadan locality of Cabeza Blanca (Chubut, Argentina), including skull fragments unknown for the species thus far, and well-preserved juvenile teeth, along with a large number of specimens from collections inArgentina, allow us to propose a more complete description of the genus and a new taxonomic arrangement for the Cephalomys species. We also analysed some dubious records of Cephalomys from Quebrada Honda and Pico Truncado and confirm that they are not part of this genus. We consider C. plexus to be a synonym of C. arcidens, we consider the combination previously proposed for C. bolivianus (as a species of Asteromys) to be valid, and we consider C.ceciae also to be a valid species. We performed a phylogenetic analysis including for the first time all cephalomyids (Cephalomys, Litodontomys, Cephalomyopsis, Soriamys and Banderomys) and possibly related genera (Perimys, Scotamys, Asteromys) to test the position of the family Cephalomyidae among the other caviomorph rodents, as well as its validity and internal relationships. The results recovered Cephalomyidae as a clade, including Cephalomys,Cephalomyopsis and Litodontomys. The monophyly of Cephalomys could not be confirmed. Soriamys and Banderomys were recovered within Cavioidea. Perimys, Scotamys and Asteromys were recovered within Chinchilloidea, and we analysed the implications of their positions within the group. The implications in terms of the biochron, distribution and evolutionary history of the Cephalomyidae, considering the new definition for the family proposed herein (includingonly Cephalomys, Cephalomyopsis and Litodontomys), are discussed, as well as inferences regarding caviomorph evolution at the scale of the entire group.