INPA   24560
UNIDAD EJECUTORA DE INVESTIGACIONES EN PRODUCCION ANIMAL
Unidad Ejecutora - UE
artículos
Título:
A novel individual-tree mixed model to account for competition and environmental heterogeneity: a Bayesian approach
Autor/es:
CAPPA, EDUARDO P.; MUÑOZ, FACUNDO; SANCHEZ, LEOPOLDO; CANTET, R. J. C.
Revista:
TREE GENETICS & GENOMES
Editorial:
SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
Referencias:
Lugar: HEIDELBERG; Año: 2015 vol. 15 p. 120 - 135
ISSN:
1614-2942
Resumen:
Negative correlation caused by competition among individuals and positive spatial correlation due to environmental heterogeneity may lead to biases in estimating genetic parameters and predicting breeding values (BVs) from forest genetic trials. Former models dealing with competition and environmental heterogeneity did not account for the additive relationships among trees or for the full spatial covariance. This paper extends an individual-tree mixed model with directadditive genetic, genetic, and environmental competition effects, by incorporating a two-dimensional smoothing surface to account for complex patterns of environmental heterogeneity (competition + spatial model (CSM)). We illustrate the proposed model using simulated and real data from a loblolly pine progeny trial. The CSM was compared with three reduced individual-tree mixed models using a real dataset, while simulations comprised only CSM versus true-parameters comparisons. Dispersion parameters were estimated using Bayesian techniques via Gibbs sampling. Simulation results showed that the CSM yielded posterior mean estimates of variance components with slight or negligible biases in the studied scenarios, except for the permanent environment variance.The worst performance of the simulated CSM was undera scenario with weak competition effects and small-scale environmental heterogeneity. When analyzing real data, the CSM yielded a lower value of the deviance information criterion than the reduced models. Moreover, although correlations between predicted BVs calculated from CSM and from a standard model with block effects and direct genetic effects only were high, the ranking among the top 5 % ranked individuals showed differences which indicated that the two models will have quite different genotype selections for the next cycle of breeding.