DEFEASIBLE REASONING + PARTIAL MODELS: A FORMAL FRAMEWORK FOR THE METHODOLOGY OF RESEARCH PROGRAMS

TOHMÉ, FERNANDO; DELRIEUX, CLAUDIO; BUENO, OTAVIO

FOUNDATIONS OF SCIENCE

SPRINGER

Lugar: Berlin; Año: 2011 vol. 16 p. 47 - 65

1233-1821

<!-- /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-parent:""; margin:0pt; margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";} @page Section1 {size:595.3pt 841.9pt; margin:70.85pt 85.05pt 70.85pt 85.05pt; mso-header-margin:35.4pt; mso-footer-margin:35.4pt; mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} --> In this paper we show that any reasoning process in which conclusions can be both fallible and corrigible can be formalized in terms of two approaches: (i) syntactically, with the use of defeasible reasoning, according to which reasoning consists in the construction and assessment of arguments for and against a given claim, and (ii) semantically, with the use of partial structures, which allow for the representation of less than conclusive information. We are particularly interested in the formalization of scientific reasoning, along the lines traced by Lakatos’ methodology of scientific research programs. We show how current debates in cosmology could be put into this framework, shedding light on a very controversial topic.