Integrative forest management using variable retention balancing timber and biodiversity conservation in Southern Patagonia

SOLER R.M.; SCHINDLER S.; LENCINAS M.V.; PERI P.L.; MARTÍNEZ PASTUR G.

Tartu

Conferencia; IUFRO Landscape Ecology Conference; 2015

IUFRO

Forests provide several ecosystem services, but traditional management is focused in provision, disregarding other services and conservation. Variableretention harvesting (VR) was suggested to maintain postharvest original structure and diversity. Here, we test the performance of VR in conservingbiodiversity, synthesizing results from long-term data in N oth ofa g us forests. We included 533 study cases measured 1 to 8 years postharvest(YAH), comparing the effect of aggregated (AR) and dispersed retention(DR) with primary forests (PF). We calculated z-effect sizes for eachcomparison and used random-effect models with categorical data. Speciestypical of PF kept its populations in AR, but not in DR. Species from otherhabitats were negatively affected by AR, but positively by DR. The temporal trends showed an increase of richness (highest values for 1-2 YAH) and abundance (highest values for 5-8 YAH), due to allochthonous plants, being stronger in DR than AR. VR impacted in harvested areas, mainly in DR, due to the increase of allochthonous species and those autochthonous from other associated non-timber habitats. However, in AR, plants, insects and birds of primary forests were maintained in seemingly stable populations and similar conditions to forests with natural dynamics.