An introduction to the genus Bibimys (Rodentia: Sigmodontinae): phylogenetic position and alpha taxonomy

D'ELÍA, G.; PARDIÑAS, U.F.J.; MYERS, P.

Mammalian Diversification: From Chromosomes to Phylogeography (A Celebration of the Career of James L. Patton)

University of California Press

Lugar: Berkeley; Año: 2005; p. 211 - 246

Bibimys is an exceptionally poorly understood genus of sigmodontine rodents. It is known from both fossil and recent specimens. Currently, Bibimys, with three species, is placed with the genera Kunsia and Scapteromys in the tribe Scapteromyini. This study is the first to examine the phylogenetic position of Bibimys within the Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with This study is the first to examine the phylogenetic position of Bibimys within the Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with This study is the first to examine the phylogenetic position of Bibimys within the Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with species, is placed with the genera Kunsia and Scapteromys in the tribe Scapteromyini. This study is the first to examine the phylogenetic position of Bibimys within the Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with This study is the first to examine the phylogenetic position of Bibimys within the Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with This study is the first to examine the phylogenetic position of Bibimys within the Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with species, is placed with the genera Kunsia and Scapteromys in the tribe Scapteromyini. This study is the first to examine the phylogenetic position of Bibimys within the Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with This study is the first to examine the phylogenetic position of Bibimys within the Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with This study is the first to examine the phylogenetic position of Bibimys within the Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with known from both fossil and recent specimens. Currently, Bibimys, with three species, is placed with the genera Kunsia and Scapteromys in the tribe Scapteromyini. This study is the first to examine the phylogenetic position of Bibimys within the Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with This study is the first to examine the phylogenetic position of Bibimys within the Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with This study is the first to examine the phylogenetic position of Bibimys within the Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with species, is placed with the genera Kunsia and Scapteromys in the tribe Scapteromyini. This study is the first to examine the phylogenetic position of Bibimys within the Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with This study is the first to examine the phylogenetic position of Bibimys within the Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with This study is the first to examine the phylogenetic position of Bibimys within the Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with species, is placed with the genera Kunsia and Scapteromys in the tribe Scapteromyini. This study is the first to examine the phylogenetic position of Bibimys within the Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with This study is the first to examine the phylogenetic position of Bibimys within the Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with This study is the first to examine the phylogenetic position of Bibimys within the Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with known from both fossil and recent specimens. Currently, Bibimys, with three species, is placed with the genera Kunsia and Scapteromys in the tribe Scapteromyini. This study is the first to examine the phylogenetic position of Bibimys within the Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with This study is the first to examine the phylogenetic position of Bibimys within the Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with This study is the first to examine the phylogenetic position of Bibimys within the Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with species, is placed with the genera Kunsia and Scapteromys in the tribe Scapteromyini. This study is the first to examine the phylogenetic position of Bibimys within the Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with This study is the first to examine the phylogenetic position of Bibimys within the Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with This study is the first to examine the phylogenetic position of Bibimys within the Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with species, is placed with the genera Kunsia and Scapteromys in the tribe Scapteromyini. This study is the first to examine the phylogenetic position of Bibimys within the Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with This study is the first to examine the phylogenetic position of Bibimys within the Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with This study is the first to examine the phylogenetic position of Bibimys within the Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with is an exceptionally poorly understood genus of sigmodontine rodents. It is known from both fossil and recent specimens. Currently, Bibimys, with three species, is placed with the genera Kunsia and Scapteromys in the tribe Scapteromyini. This study is the first to examine the phylogenetic position of Bibimys within the Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with This study is the first to examine the phylogenetic position of Bibimys within the Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with This study is the first to examine the phylogenetic position of Bibimys within the Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with species, is placed with the genera Kunsia and Scapteromys in the tribe Scapteromyini. This study is the first to examine the phylogenetic position of Bibimys within the Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with This study is the first to examine the phylogenetic position of Bibimys within the Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with This study is the first to examine the phylogenetic position of Bibimys within the Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with species, is placed with the genera Kunsia and Scapteromys in the tribe Scapteromyini. This study is the first to examine the phylogenetic position of Bibimys within the Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with This study is the first to examine the phylogenetic position of Bibimys within the Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with This study is the first to examine the phylogenetic position of Bibimys within the Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Bibimys, with three species, is placed with the genera Kunsia and Scapteromys in the tribe Scapteromyini. This study is the first to examine the phylogenetic position of Bibimys within the Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with This study is the first to examine the phylogenetic position of Bibimys within the Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with This study is the first to examine the phylogenetic position of Bibimys within the Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Kunsia and Scapteromys in the tribe Scapteromyini. This study is the first to examine the phylogenetic position of Bibimys within the Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Bibimys within the Sigmodontinae and, in particular, to examine its purported close relationship with Kunsia and Scapteromys. It is the first study to include samples of all three of the currently recognized species of Bibimys. We found that Bibimys, Kunsia and currently recognized species of Bibimys. We found that Bibimys, Kunsia and currently recognized species of Bibimys. We found that Bibimys, Kunsia and and Scapteromys. It is the first study to include samples of all three of the currently recognized species of Bibimys. We found that Bibimys, Kunsia andBibimys. We found that Bibimys, Kunsia and Scapteromys do not form a monophyletic group and that all three genera seem to be part of the akodont radiation. We present an amended diagnosis of the genus. Our analyses cast doubt on the distinctiveness of the three forms currently included within Bibimys. A gazetteer of Bibimys localities is presented. Finally, we suggest future research directions that should shed new light on the evolutionary history of this little-known genus. future research directions that should shed new light on the evolutionary history of this little-known genus. future research directions that should shed new light on the evolutionary history of this little-known genus. part of the akodont radiation. We present an amended diagnosis of the genus. Our analyses cast doubt on the distinctiveness of the three forms currently included within Bibimys. A gazetteer of Bibimys localities is presented. Finally, we suggest future research directions that should shed new light on the evolutionary history of this little-known genus. future research directions that should shed new light on the evolutionary history of this little-known genus. future research directions that should shed new light on the evolutionary history of this little-known genus. part of the akodont radiation. We present an amended diagnosis of the genus. Our analyses cast doubt on the distinctiveness of the three forms currently included within Bibimys. A gazetteer of Bibimys localities is presented. Finally, we suggest future research directions that should shed new light on the evolutionary history of this little-known genus. future research directions that should shed new light on the evolutionary history of this little-known genus. future research directions that should shed new light on the evolutionary history of this little-known genus. do not form a monophyletic group and that all three genera seem to be part of the akodont radiation. We present an amended diagnosis of the genus. Our analyses cast doubt on the distinctiveness of the three forms currently included within Bibimys. A gazetteer of Bibimys localities is presented. Finally, we suggest future research directions that should shed new light on the evolutionary history of this little-known genus. future research directions that should shed new light on the evolutionary history of this little-known genus. future research directions that should shed new light on the evolutionary history of this little-known genus. Bibimys. A gazetteer of Bibimys localities is presented. Finally, we suggest future research directions that should shed new light on the evolutionary history of this little-known genus.