BODANZA Gustavo Adrian
congresos y reuniones científicas
Argumentation games for admissibility and cogency criteria
BODANZA, GUSTAVO ADRIÁN; TOHMÉ, FERNANDO ABEL; SIMARI, GUILLERMO R.
Congreso; Fourth International Conference on Computational Models of Argument; 2012
Institute of Artificial Intelligence, University of Groningen
In this work, we develop a game-theoretic framework in which pro andcon arguments are put forward. The deﬁned framework intends to capture win-ning strategies for different defense criteria; each possible extension semantics sat-isﬁes a particular defense criterion. To ensure that only semantics satisfying givencriteria are obtained protocols for playing have to be deﬁned, being the ensuingwinning strategies full characterizations of the corresponding criteria. Admissibil-ity and strong admissibility are two of those criteria proposed in the literature forthe evaluation of extension semantics; here, we also introduce two weaker criteria,pairwise and weak cogency, for the evaluation of non-admissible semantics, andwe deﬁne speciﬁc game protocols to capture them.