IFIBYNE   05513
INSTITUTO DE FISIOLOGIA, BIOLOGIA MOLECULAR Y NEUROCIENCIAS
Unidad Ejecutora - UE
congresos y reuniones científicas
Título:
- A role of intragenic chromatin structure in co-transcriptional RNA processing
Autor/es:
SCHOR IE; FISZBEIN A; LLÈRES D; LAMOND AI; KORNBLIHTT AR
Lugar:
Heidelberg
Reunión:
Conferencia; EMBO Conference Chromatin and Epigenetics; 2011
Institución organizadora:
EMBO
Resumen:
Chromatin
structure is connected to the exon-intron architecture of genes, including
specific nucleosome positioning in exons as well as histone and DNA
modifications. In addition, our previous work shows an example of how
intragenic chromatin modulation can affect alternative splicing: depolarization
of the membrane potential of neuronal cells triggers an increase in intragenic
H3 acetylation along the NCAM gene, which results in skipping of the
alternative exon 18 (E18) from the mature mRNA.
We also
detected an increase of total histone acetylation and of CBP acetyl-transferase
expression after depolarization treatment, suggesting a more general role of
histone acetylation. We observed a redistribution of SC35 and SF2/ASF splicing
factors in response to both depolarization and the hyper-acetylating drug
trichostatin A (TSA): a decrease in nucleoplasmic localization and enlargement
of nuclear speckles. The same is seen in HeLa cells for several alternative and
constitutive splicing factors. Since TSA also impairs inclusion of different
exons, we interpret that disruption of normal chromatin structure causes a
decrease in the co-transcriptional recognition of splice sites by splicing
factors.
Using the
NCAM E18 exon as a model, we found evidence that neuronal differentiation of N2a
cells causes, contrary to what is seen after depolarization, intragenic
increase in transcription-repressive histone modifications (H3K9me2 and
H3K27me3) which correlates with enhanced E18 inclusion. Also, differentiation-induced
inclusion can be reversed by treatment with DNA and histone methyltransferases
inhibitors. Using available ChIP-seq and splicing microarray data we were able
to find other genes with apparent chromatin-dependent regulation of alternative
splicing during neuronal differentiation.
This leads
to a model where intragenic chromatin can be physiologically modulated in both
directions (repressive/permissive) with functional consequences to coupled
alternative splicing.