Crop nitrogen status of early- and late-sown maize at different plant densities

MALTESE, N.; MADDONNI, G. A.; MELCHIORI, R. J. M.; FERREIRA, M; CAVIGLIA, O.P.

FIELD CROPS RESEARCH

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV

Lugar: Amsterdam; Año: 2020 vol. 258

0378-4290

In maize (Zea mays L.) crops, nitrogen (N) status at silking (R1) has been used to predict grain yield (GY) response to N fertilization and to develop strategies to manage crop nutrition in order to match N supply with crop demand during growing season, such as late N fertilizations. Crop N status can be estimated by N nutrition index (NNI), which is based on actual and critical N concentration in crop biomass. Optical measurements of N concentration (e.g. SPAD readings) of the leaf blade subtending primary ear have also been used as a proxy of crop N status. Sowing date (SD) and N rates could affect soil N availability and hence crop N uptake at R1. Additionally, the effects of SD and its interaction with plant density (PD), N rates and hybrids (H) on N uptake (NuptP) andparticularly on N partitioning in leaf-blades, stem + sheaths and ears could affect SPADs readings. We hypothesized that variations of GY by crop N status at R1 promoted by SD, PD and H, would be better predicted by NNI than by SPAD readings. In this study, two Hs (DK 70− 10 VT3P and DK 73− 10 VT3P) were cropped in two contrasting SD (early and late) in Parana, Argentina (31◦44′ S 60◦32′ W) at three PD (5, 7 and 9 pl m− 2 ) with three N rates (0, 90 and 270 kg N ha-1) in order to evaluate the effect of treatments on: i) N availability, N uptake at the plant and crop level, N partitioning in leaf-blades, stem + sheaths and ears, SPAD readings and NNI at R1, and ii) the relationships among N availability and N uptake at the plant and crop level, NNI, SPAD, and GY. N concentration of leaf-blades was negatively affected by PD, but this reduction was attenuated by N rates, especially in late SD (N x PD x SD interaction). Hence, in early SD, some data of both Hs corresponding to 270 Nyielded low SPAD values for NNI greater than 0.86. Consequently, crop N status was better reflected by NNI than by SPAD readings, because NNI considers N stored in the whole plant. NNI at R1 adequately described relative GY variations promoted by SD, PD, N rates and, Hs, i.e. NNI was a more meaningful crop status index than SPAD readings. Overall, our study contributes to understanding mechanisms that regulate crop N status affected byagronomical practices and adds insights to explore in late N fertilization of maize crops.