Intestinal transplantation for gut failure

THOMAS FISHBEIN; GABRIEL GONDOLESI; STUART KAUFFMAN

GASTROENTEROLOGY

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC

Lugar: Philadelphia; Año: 2003 p. 1615 - 1628

0016-5085

In recent years, we have witnessed increasing clinical experience with intestinal transplantation at selected centers. Although early results with this therapy were poor, several important advances have led to improved outcomes. These improvements prompted the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to issue a memorandum on October 4, 2000, according federal reimbursement for intestinal transplantation at selected centers and for selected indications.1 The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services stipulated that, to qualify for transplantation, patients must meet a specific definition of intestinal failure and have experienced failure of parenteral nutrition (Table 1). In addition, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services set forth centerspecific criteria for reimbursement, including 1-year patient survival rates of at least 65% and minimum center volume of at least 10 transplants performed per year. Only 4 centers in the United States currently meet these criteria (Mount Sinai Medical Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, University of Miami, and University of Nebraska Medical Center). Thus, intestinal transplantation is currently at a crossroads, transitioning from its historical status as an experimental therapy to standard care for patients with appropriate indications. Presently, appropriate indications, timing of referral, and outcomes of intestinal transplantation are not well recognized among physicians caring for patients who may be candidates for this therapy. Definitions of terms such as ?intestinal failure? and ?failure of parenteral nutrition? are not standard, and there is no accepted algorithm for integrating parenteral nutrition, intestinal rehabilitation, and transplantation for patients with intestinal failure. Herein we review (1) the applicability of intestinal transplantation for patients with intestinal failure, (2) the current state of medical practice in intestinal transplantation with an emphasis on recent improvements, and (3) current results of this therapy. We also offer for the general gastroenterologist or gastrointestinal surgeon a rational approach to managing intestinal failure and integrating intestinal rehabilitation, parenteral nutrition, and transplantation.2n recent years, we have witnessed increasing clinical experience with intestinal transplantation at selected centers. Although early results with this therapy were poor, several important advances have led to improved outcomes. These improvements prompted the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to issue a memorandum on October 4, 2000, according federal reimbursement for intestinal transplantation at selected centers and for selected indications.1 The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services stipulated that, to qualify for transplantation, patients must meet a specific definition of intestinal failure and have experienced failure of parenteral nutrition (Table 1). In addition, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services set forth centerspecific criteria for reimbursement, including 1-year patient survival rates of at least 65% and minimum center volume of at least 10 transplants performed per year. Only 4 centers in the United States currently meet these criteria (Mount Sinai Medical Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, University of Miami, and University of Nebraska Medical Center). Thus, intestinal transplantation is currently at a crossroads, transitioning from its historical status as an experimental therapy to standard care for patients with appropriate indications. Presently, appropriate indications, timing of referral, and outcomes of intestinal transplantation are not well recognized among physicians caring for patients who may be candidates for this therapy. Definitions of terms such as ?intestinal failure? and ?failure of parenteral nutrition? are not standard, and there is no accepted algorithm for integrating parenteral nutrition, intestinal rehabilitation, and transplantation for patients with intestinal failure. Herein we review (1) the applicability of intestinal transplantation for patients with intestinal failure, (2) the current state of medical practice in intestinal transplantation with an emphasis on recent improvements, and (3) current results of this therapy. We also offer for the general gastroenterologist or gastrointestinal surgeon a rational approach to managing intestinal failure and integrating intestinal rehabilitation, parenteral nutrition, and transplantation.21 The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services stipulated that, to qualify for transplantation, patients must meet a specific definition of intestinal failure and have experienced failure of parenteral nutrition (Table 1). In addition, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services set forth centerspecific criteria for reimbursement, including 1-year patient survival rates of at least 65% and minimum center volume of at least 10 transplants performed per year. Only 4 centers in the United States currently meet these criteria (Mount Sinai Medical Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, University of Miami, and University of Nebraska Medical Center). Thus, intestinal transplantation is currently at a crossroads, transitioning from its historical status as an experimental therapy to standard care for patients with appropriate indications. Presently, appropriate indications, timing of referral, and outcomes of intestinal transplantation are not well recognized among physicians caring for patients who may be candidates for this therapy. Definitions of terms such as ?intestinal failure? and ?failure of parenteral nutrition? are not standard, and there is no accepted algorithm for integrating parenteral nutrition, intestinal rehabilitation, and transplantation for patients with intestinal failure. Herein we review (1) the applicability of intestinal transplantation for patients with intestinal failure, (2) the current state of medical practice in intestinal transplantation with an emphasis on recent improvements, and (3) current results of this therapy. We also offer for the general gastroenterologist or gastrointestinal surgeon a rational approach to managing intestinal failure and integrating intestinal rehabilitation, parenteral nutrition, and transplantation.22