INVESTIGADORES
DIAZ Sandra Myrna
artículos
Título:
Reply to Romero and Agrawal: Unpacking the specific links between biodiversity, ecosystem services, and social diversity is an essential first step.
Autor/es:
DIAZ S; QUÉTIER F; TRAINOR, S; CÁCERES, D.
Revista:
PNAS
Editorial:
National Academy of Sciences (USA)
Referencias:
Año: 2011 vol. 108 p. 197 - 197
ISSN:
1091-6490
Resumen:
Romero and Agrawal (1) question the usefulness of our framework
to link functional diversity with social actor strategies (2),
arguing that it oversimplifies the complexity of the social dimensions
of socioecological systems. We agree on the crucial
importance of such dimensions, and we repeatedly highlighted
this in our article, as is obvious from figure 1, the text, and the
examples. While focusing on functional diversity, ecosystem
services, and their role in different social actor strategies, we situated
these in a broader setting that can be analyzed with the tools
and concepts of social sciences, including institutional analyses.
Rather than replacing major existing overarching frameworks
for understanding the sustainability of socioecological systems,
we aimed to unpack the specific links between biodiversity,
ecosystem services, and the strategies of different sectors of
heterogeneous societies. In fact, the cross-cutting questions
identified in the text and in figure 1 underscore the significance
of institutional and cross-scale analysis and offer specific directions
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
of institutional and cross-scale analysis and offer specific directions
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
ecosystem services, and the strategies of different sectors of
heterogeneous societies. In fact, the cross-cutting questions
identified in the text and in figure 1 underscore the significance
of institutional and cross-scale analysis and offer specific directions
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
of institutional and cross-scale analysis and offer specific directions
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
examples. While focusing on functional diversity, ecosystem
services, and their role in different social actor strategies, we situated
these in a broader setting that can be analyzed with the tools
and concepts of social sciences, including institutional analyses.
Rather than replacing major existing overarching frameworks
for understanding the sustainability of socioecological systems,
we aimed to unpack the specific links between biodiversity,
ecosystem services, and the strategies of different sectors of
heterogeneous societies. In fact, the cross-cutting questions
identified in the text and in figure 1 underscore the significance
of institutional and cross-scale analysis and offer specific directions
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
of institutional and cross-scale analysis and offer specific directions
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
ecosystem services, and the strategies of different sectors of
heterogeneous societies. In fact, the cross-cutting questions
identified in the text and in figure 1 underscore the significance
of institutional and cross-scale analysis and offer specific directions
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
of institutional and cross-scale analysis and offer specific directions
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
of socioecological systems. We agree on the crucial
importance of such dimensions, and we repeatedly highlighted
this in our article, as is obvious from figure 1, the text, and the
examples. While focusing on functional diversity, ecosystem
services, and their role in different social actor strategies, we situated
these in a broader setting that can be analyzed with the tools
and concepts of social sciences, including institutional analyses.
Rather than replacing major existing overarching frameworks
for understanding the sustainability of socioecological systems,
we aimed to unpack the specific links between biodiversity,
ecosystem services, and the strategies of different sectors of
heterogeneous societies. In fact, the cross-cutting questions
identified in the text and in figure 1 underscore the significance
of institutional and cross-scale analysis and offer specific directions
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
of institutional and cross-scale analysis and offer specific directions
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
ecosystem services, and the strategies of different sectors of
heterogeneous societies. In fact, the cross-cutting questions
identified in the text and in figure 1 underscore the significance
of institutional and cross-scale analysis and offer specific directions
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
of institutional and cross-scale analysis and offer specific directions
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
examples. While focusing on functional diversity, ecosystem
services, and their role in different social actor strategies, we situated
these in a broader setting that can be analyzed with the tools
and concepts of social sciences, including institutional analyses.
Rather than replacing major existing overarching frameworks
for understanding the sustainability of socioecological systems,
we aimed to unpack the specific links between biodiversity,
ecosystem services, and the strategies of different sectors of
heterogeneous societies. In fact, the cross-cutting questions
identified in the text and in figure 1 underscore the significance
of institutional and cross-scale analysis and offer specific directions
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
of institutional and cross-scale analysis and offer specific directions
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
ecosystem services, and the strategies of different sectors of
heterogeneous societies. In fact, the cross-cutting questions
identified in the text and in figure 1 underscore the significance
of institutional and cross-scale analysis and offer specific directions
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
of institutional and cross-scale analysis and offer specific directions
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
fies the complexity of the social dimensions
of socioecological systems. We agree on the crucial
importance of such dimensions, and we repeatedly highlighted
this in our article, as is obvious from figure 1, the text, and the
examples. While focusing on functional diversity, ecosystem
services, and their role in different social actor strategies, we situated
these in a broader setting that can be analyzed with the tools
and concepts of social sciences, including institutional analyses.
Rather than replacing major existing overarching frameworks
for understanding the sustainability of socioecological systems,
we aimed to unpack the specific links between biodiversity,
ecosystem services, and the strategies of different sectors of
heterogeneous societies. In fact, the cross-cutting questions
identified in the text and in figure 1 underscore the significance
of institutional and cross-scale analysis and offer specific directions
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
of institutional and cross-scale analysis and offer specific directions
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
ecosystem services, and the strategies of different sectors of
heterogeneous societies. In fact, the cross-cutting questions
identified in the text and in figure 1 underscore the significance
of institutional and cross-scale analysis and offer specific directions
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
of institutional and cross-scale analysis and offer specific directions
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
examples. While focusing on functional diversity, ecosystem
services, and their role in different social actor strategies, we situated
these in a broader setting that can be analyzed with the tools
and concepts of social sciences, including institutional analyses.
Rather than replacing major existing overarching frameworks
for understanding the sustainability of socioecological systems,
we aimed to unpack the specific links between biodiversity,
ecosystem services, and the strategies of different sectors of
heterogeneous societies. In fact, the cross-cutting questions
identified in the text and in figure 1 underscore the significance
of institutional and cross-scale analysis and offer specific directions
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
of institutional and cross-scale analysis and offer specific directions
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
ecosystem services, and the strategies of different sectors of
heterogeneous societies. In fact, the cross-cutting questions
identified in the text and in figure 1 underscore the significance
of institutional and cross-scale analysis and offer specific directions
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
of institutional and cross-scale analysis and offer specific directions
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
figure 1, the text, and the
examples. While focusing on functional diversity, ecosystem
services, and their role in different social actor strategies, we situated
these in a broader setting that can be analyzed with the tools
and concepts of social sciences, including institutional analyses.
Rather than replacing major existing overarching frameworks
for understanding the sustainability of socioecological systems,
we aimed to unpack the specific links between biodiversity,
ecosystem services, and the strategies of different sectors of
heterogeneous societies. In fact, the cross-cutting questions
identified in the text and in figure 1 underscore the significance
of institutional and cross-scale analysis and offer specific directions
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
of institutional and cross-scale analysis and offer specific directions
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
ecosystem services, and the strategies of different sectors of
heterogeneous societies. In fact, the cross-cutting questions
identified in the text and in figure 1 underscore the significance
of institutional and cross-scale analysis and offer specific directions
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
of institutional and cross-scale analysis and offer specific directions
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
unpack the specific links between biodiversity,
ecosystem services, and the strategies of different sectors of
heterogeneous societies. In fact, the cross-cutting questions
identified in the text and in figure 1 underscore the significance
of institutional and cross-scale analysis and offer specific directions
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
of institutional and cross-scale analysis and offer specific directions
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
fied in the text and in figure 1 underscore the significance
of institutional and cross-scale analysis and offer specific directions
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).
fic directions
for moving forward in deepening our understanding of
functional biodiversity and ecosystem service dynamics (directly
in questions 13 and indirectly in question 4).3 and indirectly in question 4).
