THE TAPHONOMIC TRUE BAHAMIAN STORY: UNVEILING THE CONSEQUENCES OF SPECIES ABUNDANCE ON TAPHOFACIES IN SAN SALVADOR ISLAND

BAYER, M S; BALSEIRO, D.; MUÑOZ, D.; GORDILLO, S

Mendoza

Congreso; 4th International Palaeontological Congress; 2014

Several previous studies have underscored the importance of how intrinsic variations in shell  characteristics affect the final taphonomic attributes of shell deposits. Other studies have shown  that the composition of shell supply only affects the intensity of each attribute but not its rank-order.  Although these are promising results for taphofacies analysis, we still cannot confidently assess that  taphofacies are free from biological biases. If species with different taphonomic responses differ  dramatically in their abundances among rather similar environments, contrasting taphofacies could  be identified for the same environment without reflecting real differences. In this contribution we  evaluate how intrinsic differences influence the definition of taphofacies in San Salvador Island.  For this goal we studied (1) intrinsic differences between species in the rank-order and intensity  of taphonomic attributes, and (2) the effects of differences in species relative abundances on the  definition of taphofacies. Seven beaches were sampled around the island based on their geographical  position with respect to the wind trades (windward or leeward), their environmental features  based on the presence or absence of rock patches (sandy or rocky beaches) and beach zones (three  equidistant samples from the maximum level of spring tides to the minimum level of the normal tide,  and samples from the subtidal zone). We studied taphonomic attributes (fragmentation, abrasion,  teeth preservation, muscle scars, color, external glossy, external cementation, internal glossy,  internal cementation and biological incrustation) in the four most abundant bivalve species, and  calculated their relative abundance. Using multivariate analysis, two taphofacies were recognized  among geographical location and two between beach types, but none between beach zones.  Intrinsic differences in the intensity of taphonomic attributes were commonly observed within  taphofacies, while differences in the rank-order of taphonomic variables were seldom observed  between taphofacies. To further test whether taxa?s relative abundance influenced the definition of  taphofacies, we tested the correlation between samples? taphonomic response taking and not taking  into account the taxa?s abundance. A mantel test indicated that both were significantly correlated.  Differences in abundance of taxa with different intrinsic characteristics seem to have little effect on  the whole sample taphonomic signature. Therefore, two scenarios appear to be possible, either (1)  intrinsic differences among taxa, or (2) differences in their relative abundances, were not strong  enough to bias the taphonomic signature of the samples. However, because taphonomic signatures  based on each single taxon are also correlated between all four taxa, the first scenario seems to be  the most probable one.