IMETTYB   25748
INSTITUTO DE MEDICINA TRASLACIONAL, TRASPLANTE Y BIOINGENIERIA
Unidad Ejecutora - UE
artículos
Título:
Comparison of different methods for the estimation of aortic pulse wave velocity from 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance
Autor/es:
BARGIOTAS, IOANNIS; BOUAOU, KEVIN; GIRON, ALAIN; MESSAS, EMMANUEL; KACHENOURA, NADJIA; MOUSSEAUX, ELIE; DIETENBECK, THOMAS; SOULAT, GILLES; CRAIEM, DAMIAN; CHENOUNE, YASMINA; HOURIEZ--GOMBAUD-SAINTONGE, SOPHIA; DE CESARE, ALAIN; REDHEUIL, ALBAN; GENCER, UMIT; BOLLACHE, EMILIE
Revista:
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Editorial:
New York : M. Dekker, Inc., c1998-
Referencias:
Año: 2019 vol. 21
Resumen:
BackgroundArterial pulse wave velocity (PWV) is associated with increased mortality in aging and disease. Several studies have shown the accuracy of applanation tonometry carotid-femoral PWV (Cf-PWV) and the relevance of evaluating central aorta stiffness using 2D cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) to estimate PWV, and aortic distensibility-derived PWV through the theoretical Bramwell-Hill model (BH-PWV). Our aim was to compare various methods of aortic PWV (aoPWV) estimation from 4D flow CMR, in terms of associations with age, Cf-PWV, BH-PWV and left ventricular (LV) mass-to-volume ratio while evaluating inter-observer reproducibility and robustness to temporal resolution.MethodsWe studied 47 healthy subjects (49.5 ± 18 years) who underwent Cf-PWV and CMR including aortic 4D flow CMR as well as 2D cine SSFP for BH-PWV and LV mass-to-volume ratio estimation. The aorta was semi-automatically segmented from 4D flow data, and mean velocity waveforms were estimated in 25 planes perpendicular to the aortic centerline. 4D flow CMR aoPWV was calculated: using velocity curves at two locations, namely ascending aorta (AAo) and distal descending aorta (DAo) aorta (S1, 2D-like strategy), or using all velocity curves along the entire aortic centreline (3D-like strategies) with iterative transit time (TT) estimates (S2) or a plane fitting of velocity curves systolic upslope (S3). For S1 and S2, TT was calculated using three approaches: cross-correlation (TTc), wavelets (TTw) and Fourier transforms (TTf). Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman biases (BA) were used to evaluate inter-observer reproducibility and effect of lower temporal resolution.Results4D flow CMR aoPWV estimates were significantly (p