On the evolving relation between Belief Revision and Argumentation

MARCELO A. FALAPPA; ALEJANDRO J. GARCÍA; GABRIELE KERN-ISBERNER; GUILLERMO R. SIMARI

KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING REVIEW

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS

Lugar: Cambridge; Año: 2011 vol. 26 p. 35 - 43

0269-8889

Research on the relation between belief revision and argumentation has always been fruitful in both directions: some argumentation formalisms can be used to dene belief change operators, and belief change techniques have also been used for modeling the dynamics of beliefs in argumentation formalisms. In this paper we give a historical perspective on how belief revision has evolved in the last three decades, and how it has been combined with argumentation. First, we will recall the foundational works concerning the links between both areas. Based on such insights, we will present a conceptual view on this topic and some further developments. We oer a glimpse into the future of research in this area based on the understanding of argumentation and belief revision as complementary, mutually useful disciplines.