INVESTIGADORES
LEAVY Maria Pia
congresos y reuniones científicas
Título:
Building collaboration: the process of interdisciplinary research on prematurity between neonatologists and anthropologists.
Autor/es:
LEAVY, MARIA PIA; MARTINA VIOLETA PRINA; MARIA JOSÉ MARTÍNEZ CÁCERES; BAUER, GABRIELA
Lugar:
Londres
Reunión:
Simposio; UCL QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH SYMPOSIUM 2017; 2017
Institución organizadora:
University College of London
Resumen:
Introduction: This paper describes collaborative relationships between anthropologists and neonatologists engaged to research prematurity in a long term study to assess health outcomes related to preterm individuals born in 1990s in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Objective: To describe how collaboration took place, considering the discussion between anthropologists and neonatologists about qualitative methods and the medical perspective on anthropological methods during different moments from research process. (First moment: the study only involved quantitative methods and individual interviews between doctors and born preterm patients/ second moment: anthropologists were included in the research team and started to organize group interviews). Design: Descriptive and qualitative study. Setting: Hospital Prof. Dr. J. P. Garrahan, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Methods: Qualitative techniques on research process: participant observation, observation and interviews with patients (eleven adolescents and youth born preterm, median age was 18.5 ± 2.3 years old) and researchers (two nurses and two female neonatologists).Results: At the first moment, neonatologist thought anthropological perspective as a ?complement? of the ?real? study made with quantitative methods. But when the results from the group interviews started to show up, neonatologists realized that they never had the opportunity to hear their patient´s voice. So that, anthropological perspective allowed neonatologists to build new relationships with their patients and to think new ways to organize care practice?s at neonatology hospital teams. Conclusions: Qualitative methodology allowed to create a space for mutual recognition and reflection for patients and researchers. Collaboration is constructed not only between researchers, but also in the relationships interviewed patients. Collaboration can only be constructed when researcher´s preconceptions are visualized and there is a permanent dialogue during the investigation process.