Social Sciences and the Pan- American Region. Networks in Statistics and Sociology during the 1940s

DIEGO PEREYRA, HERNÁN GONZÁLEZ BOLLO

Buenos Aires

Simposio; International Colloquium: The Location of Knowledge. Locality, Empire and Transnational Networks in the Construction of Knowledge; 2003

University of Duke, University of Virginia, Universidad Torcuato Di Tella

<!-- /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-parent:""; margin:0cm; margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:ES-TRAD; mso-fareast-language:EN-US;} p.MsoBodyText3, li.MsoBodyText3, div.MsoBodyText3 {margin-top:0cm; margin-right:0cm; margin-bottom:6.0pt; margin-left:0cm; text-align:justify; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:ES-TRAD; mso-fareast-language:EN-US;} @page Section1 {size:612.0pt 792.0pt; margin:70.85pt 3.0cm 70.85pt 3.0cm; mso-header-margin:36.0pt; mso-footer-margin:36.0pt; mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} --> <!-- /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-parent:""; margin:0cm; margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";} p.MsoBodyText3, li.MsoBodyText3, div.MsoBodyText3 {margin-top:0cm; margin-right:0cm; margin-bottom:6.0pt; margin-left:0cm; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:8.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";} p.MsoBlockText, li.MsoBlockText, div.MsoBlockText {margin-top:6.0pt; margin-right:36.0pt; margin-bottom:0cm; margin-left:36.0pt; margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:justify; mso-pagination:none; font-size:11.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:EN-GB; mso-fareast-language:EN-US; layout-grid-mode:line;} @page Section1 {size:612.0pt 792.0pt; margin:70.85pt 3.0cm 70.85pt 3.0cm; mso-header-margin:36.0pt; mso-footer-margin:36.0pt; mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} --> “Social Sciences and the Pan- American Region. Networks in Statistics and Sociology during the 1940s”, en colaboración con Hernán Gonzalez Bollo, International Colloquium: The Location of Knowledge. Locality, Empire and Transnational Networks in the Construction of Knowledge, University of Duke, University of Virginia, Universidad Torcuato Di Tella. Buenos Aires, 11- 12 de diciembre, 2003.   The increasing development of social sciences in Latin America since 1930 could only be fully understood in relation to the role of funding organisations and international institutions, both from US and Europe, which aimed at the promotion of scientific research. Those organisations spread up during the course of internationalisation of social sciences that began after 1920. However, the expansion of networks changed and complicated when the world was in war after 1940. In that case, the international networks became inefficient and obsolete. Subsequently, scientists from Latin America had to re-establish those networks in order to find new channels for promoting their activities, avoiding isolation and interchanging experiences and knowledge. Thus, in this paper we will analyse two different experiences of establishing institutional networks in social sciences at that time. Firstly, we will consider the example of a group of statisticians from both North and South America, who established in 1940 the Inter- American Statistical Institute when the International Statistical Institute became extremely weak during the WW II. Secondly, we will see the case of Sociology, whose international organization, the International Institute of Sociology, drew back at the beginning of the hostilities. The lack of international support pushed the sociologists from the American continent to discuss the creation of a regional institution. Both cases could show an attempt of setting up Pan- American networks when the European webs failed. Nevertheless, one was successful while the other failed in establishing permanent institutional patterns. The analysis of both institutional experiences could be useful to understand the dynamics of Pan- Americanism during the 1940s and the different strategies applied by scientists from the region. A discussion on that topic might contribute as well to the better knowledge of the institutional capabilities of different disciplines and the role of national states in the regionalisation of social sciences at that period of time.