Improving lodgepole pine genomic evaluation using spatial correlation structure and SNP selection with single-step GBLUP

CAPPA, EDUARDO P.; RATCLIFFE, BLAISE; CHEN, CHARLES; THOMAS, BARB R.; LIU, YANG; KLUTSCH, JENNIFER; WEI, XIAOJING; AZCONA, JAIME SEBASTIAN; BENOWICZ, ANDY; SADOWAY, SHANE; ERBILGIN, NADIR; EL-KASSABY, YOUSRY A.

HEREDITY

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP

Año: 2022

0018-067X

Modeling environmental spatial heterogeneity can improve the efficiency of forest tree genomic evaluation. Furthermore, genotyping costs can be lowered by reducing the number of markers needed. We investigated the impact on variance components, breeding value accuracy, and bias of two phenotypic data adjustments (experimental design and autoregressive spatial models), and a relationship matrix calculated from a subset of markers selected for their ability to infer ancestry. Using a multiple-trait multiple-site single-step Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (ssGBLUP) approach, four scenarios (2 phenotype adjustments × 2 marker sets) were applied to diameter at breast height (DBH), height (HT), and resistance to western gall rust (WGR) in four open-pollinated progeny trials of lodgepole pine, with 1490 (out of 11,188) trees genotyped with 25,099 SNPs. As a control, we fitted the conventional ABLUP model using pedigree information. The highest heritability estimates were achieved for the ABLUP followed closely by the ssGBLUP with the full marker set and using the spatial phenotype adjustments. The highest predictive ability was obtained by using a reduced marker subset (8000 SNPs) when either the spatial (DBH: 0.429, and WGR: 0.513) or design (HT: 0.467) phenotype corrections were used. No significant difference was detected in prediction bias among the six fitted models, and all values were close to 1 (0.918?1.014). Results demonstrated that selecting informative markers, such as those capturing ancestry, can improve the predictive ability. The use of spatial correlation structure increased traits? heritability andreduced prediction bias, while increases in predictive ability were trait-dependent.