Improving the quality of maternity services in Nepal through accelerated implementation of essential interventions by healthcare professional associations

SPIRA, CINTIA; DHITAL, ROLINA; JACOB, SUE; DANGAL, GANESH; GURUNG, GEETA; PRASAD SHRESTHA, LAXMAN; PRASAD BISTA, KRISHNA; BAJRACHARYA, KIRAN; BAJRACHAYRA, LATA; BARAL, GEHANATH; MAIYA KAWAY, NANI; RUSHAWN, HAMID; COOPER, PETER; DAY-STIRK, FRANCES; BERRUETA, MABEL; GIBBONS, LUZ; GARCÍA-ELORRIO, EZEQUIEL; BELIZÁN, JOSÉ M.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY OBSTETRICS

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD

Año: 2018 vol. 143 p. 379 - 386

0020-7292

ObjectiveTo assess whether the implementation of a package of activities through the joint action of three international healthcare professional associations (HCPAs) increased the use of essential interventions (EIs) for delivery and neonatal care.MethodsA noncontrolled pre‐intervention versus post‐intervention study was conducted from June 13 to December 13, 2016, among women older than 18 years of age, who had delivered at one of two urban tertiary hospitals in Nepal.ResultsThe study included 9252 women. Minimal change was found after the implementation of EIs that were used frequently at baseline (e.g. social support during delivery in the emergency room, and promotion and support for early initiation of breastfeeding). By contrast, an increase was recorded for some EIs that had not been used regularly at baseline. For example, the rate of timely administration of prophylactic antibiotics before cesarean delivery increased from 0.0% (0/496) to 94.0% (409/435) at one hospital. Nonetheless, some EIs with low use at baseline did not show improvement after implementation (e.g. kangaroo mother care).ConclusionThe present study strengthened previous findings regarding the uptake of EIs following joint promotion by HCPAs in low‐income settings.