Substructural Logics, Pluralism and Collapse

PAILOS, FEDERICO MATÍAS; BARRIO, EDUARDO ALEJANDRO; SZMUC, DAMIÁN

SYNTHESE (DORDRECHT)

SPRINGER

Lugar: Berlin; Año: 2018 p. 1 - 17

0039-7857

When discussing Logical Pluralism several critics argue that such an open-minded position is untenable. The key to this conclusion is that, given a number of widely accepted assumptions, the pluralist view collapses into Logical Monism. In this paper we show that the arguments usually employed to arrive at this conclusion do not work. The main reason for this is the existence of certain substructural logics which have the same set of valid inferences than Classical Logic? although they are, in a clear sense, non-identical to it. We argue that this phenomenon can be generalized, given the existence of logics which coincide with Classical Logic regarding a number of metainferential levels?although they are, again, clearly different systems. We claim this highlights the need to arrive at a more refined version of the Collapse Argument, which we discuss at the end of the paper.