INVESTIGADORES
CANDELA Adriana Magdalena
artículos
Título:
Mamíferos de la Formación Salicas (Mioceno tardío), provincia de La Rioja, Noroeste de Argentina: paleobiogeografía, edad y paleoambiente.
Autor/es:
BRANDONI, D., G. I. SCHMIDT, A. M. CANDELA, J. I. NORIEGA, E. BRUNETTO, Y L. E FIORELLI.
Revista:
AMEGHINIANA
Editorial:
ASOCIACION PALEONTOLOGICA ARGENTINA
Referencias:
Lugar: Buenos Aires; Año: 2012 p. 375 - 387
ISSN:
0002-7014
Resumen:
Abstract. This study analyzes a collection of fossil mammals from the Salicas Formation in the El Degolladito area, La Rioja Province, Argentina. The materials reported herein were recovered from two sites (site 1 and site 2) and are: Macrochorobates Scillato-Yané, Chasicotatus The materials reported herein were recovered from two sites (site 1 and site 2) and are: Macrochorobates Scillato-Yané, Chasicotatus The materials reported herein were recovered from two sites (site 1 and site 2) and are: Macrochorobates Scillato-Yané, Chasicotatus The materials reported herein were recovered from two sites (site 1 and site 2) and are: Macrochorobates Scillato-Yané, Chasicotatus The materials reported herein were recovered from two sites (site 1 and site 2) and are: Macrochorobates Scillato-Yané, Chasicotatus This study analyzes a collection of fossil mammals from the Salicas Formation in the El Degolladito area, La Rioja Province, Argentina. The materials reported herein were recovered from two sites (site 1 and site 2) and are: Macrochorobates Scillato-Yané, ChasicotatusMacrochorobates Scillato-Yané, Chasicotatus Scillato-Yané, and Hoplophorini indet. (Xenarthra, Cingulata); Paedotherium minor Cabrera, cf Pseudotypotherium Ameghino (Notoungulata, Typotheria); Neobrachytherium Soria (Litopterna, Lopholipterna); Orthomyctera Ameghino, cf. Cardiomys Ameghino, Lagostomus Typotheria); Neobrachytherium Soria (Litopterna, Lopholipterna); Orthomyctera Ameghino, cf. Cardiomys Ameghino, Lagostomus Typotheria); Neobrachytherium Soria (Litopterna, Lopholipterna); Orthomyctera Ameghino, cf. Cardiomys Ameghino, Lagostomus Typotheria); Neobrachytherium Soria (Litopterna, Lopholipterna); Orthomyctera Ameghino, cf. Cardiomys Ameghino, Lagostomus Typotheria); Neobrachytherium Soria (Litopterna, Lopholipterna); Orthomyctera Ameghino, cf. Cardiomys Ameghino, Lagostomus Paedotherium minor Cabrera, cf Pseudotypotherium Ameghino (Notoungulata, Typotheria); Neobrachytherium Soria (Litopterna, Lopholipterna); Orthomyctera Ameghino, cf. Cardiomys Ameghino, LagostomusNeobrachytherium Soria (Litopterna, Lopholipterna); Orthomyctera Ameghino, cf. Cardiomys Ameghino, Lagostomus (Lagostomopsis) Kraglievich, and Octodontidae indet. (Rodentia, Caviomorpha). This new mammalian assemblage, together with one previously recorded, has several taxa in common with mammalian associations from Central Argentina (i.e., La Pampa Province). Among those coming from Northwestern Argentina, the major affinity is with the El Jarillal Member (Chiquimil Formation) and then the Andalhuala Formation (both in Catamarca Province). The Salicas Formation fauna is considered as latest Miocene in age until new fossil discoveries and radioisotopic dates allow a better calibration. The fossil biota and geological data suggests that the Salicas Formation was deposited in flatlands, under warm and dry conditions. This environment was dominated by open grasslands, with forested areas near rivers and lagoons coming from Northwestern Argentina, the major affinity is with the El Jarillal Member (Chiquimil Formation) and then the Andalhuala Formation (both in Catamarca Province). The Salicas Formation fauna is considered as latest Miocene in age until new fossil discoveries and radioisotopic dates allow a better calibration. The fossil biota and geological data suggests that the Salicas Formation was deposited in flatlands, under warm and dry conditions. This environment was dominated by open grasslands, with forested areas near rivers and lagoons coming from Northwestern Argentina, the major affinity is with the El Jarillal Member (Chiquimil Formation) and then the Andalhuala Formation (both in Catamarca Province). The Salicas Formation fauna is considered as latest Miocene in age until new fossil discoveries and radioisotopic dates allow a better calibration. The fossil biota and geological data suggests that the Salicas Formation was deposited in flatlands, under warm and dry conditions. This environment was dominated by open grasslands, with forested areas near rivers and lagoons coming from Northwestern Argentina, the major affinity is with the El Jarillal Member (Chiquimil Formation) and then the Andalhuala Formation (both in Catamarca Province). The Salicas Formation fauna is considered as latest Miocene in age until new fossil discoveries and radioisotopic dates allow a better calibration. The fossil biota and geological data suggests that the Salicas Formation was deposited in flatlands, under warm and dry conditions. This environment was dominated by open grasslands, with forested areas near rivers and lagoons coming from Northwestern Argentina, the major affinity is with the El Jarillal Member (Chiquimil Formation) and then the Andalhuala Formation (both in Catamarca Province). The Salicas Formation fauna is considered as latest Miocene in age until new fossil discoveries and radioisotopic dates allow a better calibration. The fossil biota and geological data suggests that the Salicas Formation was deposited in flatlands, under warm and dry conditions. This environment was dominated by open grasslands, with forested areas near rivers and lagoons recorded, has several taxa in common with mammalian associations from Central Argentina (i.e., La Pampa Province). Among those coming from Northwestern Argentina, the major affinity is with the El Jarillal Member (Chiquimil Formation) and then the Andalhuala Formation (both in Catamarca Province). The Salicas Formation fauna is considered as latest Miocene in age until new fossil discoveries and radioisotopic dates allow a better calibration. The fossil biota and geological data suggests that the Salicas Formation was deposited in flatlands, under warm and dry conditions. This environment was dominated by open grasslands, with forested areas near rivers and lagoons coming from Northwestern Argentina, the major affinity is with the El Jarillal Member (Chiquimil Formation) and then the Andalhuala Formation (both in Catamarca Province). The Salicas Formation fauna is considered as latest Miocene in age until new fossil discoveries and radioisotopic dates allow a better calibration. The fossil biota and geological data suggests that the Salicas Formation was deposited in flatlands, under warm and dry conditions. This environment was dominated by open grasslands, with forested areas near rivers and lagoons coming from Northwestern Argentina, the major affinity is with the El Jarillal Member (Chiquimil Formation) and then the Andalhuala Formation (both in Catamarca Province). The Salicas Formation fauna is considered as latest Miocene in age until new fossil discoveries and radioisotopic dates allow a better calibration. The fossil biota and geological data suggests that the Salicas Formation was deposited in flatlands, under warm and dry conditions. This environment was dominated by open grasslands, with forested areas near rivers and lagoons coming from Northwestern Argentina, the major affinity is with the El Jarillal Member (Chiquimil Formation) and then the Andalhuala Formation (both in Catamarca Province). The Salicas Formation fauna is considered as latest Miocene in age until new fossil discoveries and radioisotopic dates allow a better calibration. The fossil biota and geological data suggests that the Salicas Formation was deposited in flatlands, under warm and dry conditions. This environment was dominated by open grasslands, with forested areas near rivers and lagoons coming from Northwestern Argentina, the major affinity is with the El Jarillal Member (Chiquimil Formation) and then the Andalhuala Formation (both in Catamarca Province). The Salicas Formation fauna is considered as latest Miocene in age until new fossil discoveries and radioisotopic dates allow a better calibration. The fossil biota and geological data suggests that the Salicas Formation was deposited in flatlands, under warm and dry conditions. This environment was dominated by open grasslands, with forested areas near rivers and lagoons recorded, has several taxa in common with mammalian associations from Central Argentina (i.e., La Pampa Province). Among those coming from Northwestern Argentina, the major affinity is with the El Jarillal Member (Chiquimil Formation) and then the Andalhuala Formation (both in Catamarca Province). The Salicas Formation fauna is considered as latest Miocene in age until new fossil discoveries and radioisotopic dates allow a better calibration. The fossil biota and geological data suggests that the Salicas Formation was deposited in flatlands, under warm and dry conditions. This environment was dominated by open grasslands, with forested areas near rivers and lagoons coming from Northwestern Argentina, the major affinity is with the El Jarillal Member (Chiquimil Formation) and then the Andalhuala Formation (both in Catamarca Province). The Salicas Formation fauna is considered as latest Miocene in age until new fossil discoveries and radioisotopic dates allow a better calibration. The fossil biota and geological data suggests that the Salicas Formation was deposited in flatlands, under warm and dry conditions. This environment was dominated by open grasslands, with forested areas near rivers and lagoons coming from Northwestern Argentina, the major affinity is with the El Jarillal Member (Chiquimil Formation) and then the Andalhuala Formation (both in Catamarca Province). The Salicas Formation fauna is considered as latest Miocene in age until new fossil discoveries and radioisotopic dates allow a better calibration. The fossil biota and geological data suggests that the Salicas Formation was deposited in flatlands, under warm and dry conditions. This environment was dominated by open grasslands, with forested areas near rivers and lagoons coming from Northwestern Argentina, the major affinity is with the El Jarillal Member (Chiquimil Formation) and then the Andalhuala Formation (both in Catamarca Province). The Salicas Formation fauna is considered as latest Miocene in age until new fossil discoveries and radioisotopic dates allow a better calibration. The fossil biota and geological data suggests that the Salicas Formation was deposited in flatlands, under warm and dry conditions. This environment was dominated by open grasslands, with forested areas near rivers and lagoons coming from Northwestern Argentina, the major affinity is with the El Jarillal Member (Chiquimil Formation) and then the Andalhuala Formation (both in Catamarca Province). The Salicas Formation fauna is considered as latest Miocene in age until new fossil discoveries and radioisotopic dates allow a better calibration. The fossil biota and geological data suggests that the Salicas Formation was deposited in flatlands, under warm and dry conditions. This environment was dominated by open grasslands, with forested areas near rivers and lagoons recorded, has several taxa in common with mammalian associations from Central Argentina (i.e., La Pampa Province). Among those coming from Northwestern Argentina, the major affinity is with the El Jarillal Member (Chiquimil Formation) and then the Andalhuala Formation (both in Catamarca Province). The Salicas Formation fauna is considered as latest Miocene in age until new fossil discoveries and radioisotopic dates allow a better calibration. The fossil biota and geological data suggests that the Salicas Formation was deposited in flatlands, under warm and dry conditions. This environment was dominated by open grasslands, with forested areas near rivers and lagoons coming from Northwestern Argentina, the major affinity is with the El Jarillal Member (Chiquimil Formation) and then the Andalhuala Formation (both in Catamarca Province). The Salicas Formation fauna is considered as latest Miocene in age until new fossil discoveries and radioisotopic dates allow a better calibration. The fossil biota and geological data suggests that the Salicas Formation was deposited in flatlands, under warm and dry conditions. This environment was dominated by open grasslands, with forested areas near rivers and lagoons coming from Northwestern Argentina, the major affinity is with the El Jarillal Member (Chiquimil Formation) and then the Andalhuala Formation (both in Catamarca Province). The Salicas Formation fauna is considered as latest Miocene in age until new fossil discoveries and radioisotopic dates allow a better calibration. The fossil biota and geological data suggests that the Salicas Formation was deposited in flatlands, under warm and dry conditions. This environment was dominated by open grasslands, with forested areas near rivers and lagoons coming from Northwestern Argentina, the major affinity is with the El Jarillal Member (Chiquimil Formation) and then the Andalhuala Formation (both in Catamarca Province). The Salicas Formation fauna is considered as latest Miocene in age until new fossil discoveries and radioisotopic dates allow a better calibration. The fossil biota and geological data suggests that the Salicas Formation was deposited in flatlands, under warm and dry conditions. This environment was dominated by open grasslands, with forested areas near rivers and lagoons coming from Northwestern Argentina, the major affinity is with the El Jarillal Member (Chiquimil Formation) and then the Andalhuala Formation (both in Catamarca Province). The Salicas Formation fauna is considered as latest Miocene in age until new fossil discoveries and radioisotopic dates allow a better calibration. The fossil biota and geological data suggests that the Salicas Formation was deposited in flatlands, under warm and dry conditions. This environment was dominated by open grasslands, with forested areas near rivers and lagoons recorded, has several taxa in common with mammalian associations from Central Argentina (i.e., La Pampa Province). Among those coming from Northwestern Argentina, the major affinity is with the El Jarillal Member (Chiquimil Formation) and then the Andalhuala Formation (both in Catamarca Province). The Salicas Formation fauna is considered as latest Miocene in age until new fossil discoveries and radioisotopic dates allow a better calibration. The fossil biota and geological data suggests that the Salicas Formation was deposited in flatlands, under warm and dry conditions. This environment was dominated by open grasslands, with forested areas near rivers and lagoons coming from Northwestern Argentina, the major affinity is with the El Jarillal Member (Chiquimil Formation) and then the Andalhuala Formation (both in Catamarca Province). The Salicas Formation fauna is considered as latest Miocene in age until new fossil discoveries and radioisotopic dates allow a better calibration. The fossil biota and geological data suggests that the Salicas Formation was deposited in flatlands, under warm and dry conditions. This environment was dominated by open grasslands, with forested areas near rivers and lagoons coming from Northwestern Argentina, the major affinity is with the El Jarillal Member (Chiquimil Formation) and then the Andalhuala Formation (both in Catamarca Province). The Salicas Formation fauna is considered as latest Miocene in age until new fossil discoveries and radioisotopic dates allow a better calibration. The fossil biota and geological data suggests that the Salicas Formation was deposited in flatlands, under warm and dry conditions. This environment was dominated by open grasslands, with forested areas near rivers and lagoons coming from Northwestern Argentina, the major affinity is with the El Jarillal Member (Chiquimil Formation) and then the Andalhuala Formation (both in Catamarca Province). The Salicas Formation fauna is considered as latest Miocene in age until new fossil discoveries and radioisotopic dates allow a better calibration. The fossil biota and geological data suggests that the Salicas Formation was deposited in flatlands, under warm and dry conditions. This environment was dominated by open grasslands, with forested areas near rivers and lagoons coming from Northwestern Argentina, the major affinity is with the El Jarillal Member (Chiquimil Formation) and then the Andalhuala Formation (both in Catamarca Province). The Salicas Formation fauna is considered as latest Miocene in age until new fossil discoveries and radioisotopic dates allow a better calibration. The fossil biota and geological data suggests that the Salicas Formation was deposited in flatlands, under warm and dry conditions. This environment was dominated by open grasslands, with forested areas near rivers and lagoons Lagostomopsis) Kraglievich, and Octodontidae indet. (Rodentia, Caviomorpha). This new mammalian assemblage, together with one previously recorded, has several taxa in common with mammalian associations from Central Argentina (i.e., La Pampa Province). Among those coming from Northwestern Argentina, the major affinity is with the El Jarillal Member (Chiquimil Formation) and then the Andalhuala Formation (both in Catamarca Province). The Salicas Formation fauna is considered as latest Miocene in age until new fossil discoveries and radioisotopic dates allow a better calibration. The fossil biota and geological data suggests that the Salicas Formation was deposited in flatlands, under warm and dry conditions. This environment was dominated by open grasslands, with forested areas near rivers and lagoons coming from Northwestern Argentina, the major affinity is with the El Jarillal Member (Chiquimil Formation) and then the Andalhuala Formation (both in Catamarca Province). The Salicas Formation fauna is considered as latest Miocene in age until new fossil discoveries and radioisotopic dates allow a better calibration. The fossil biota and geological data suggests that the Salicas Formation was deposited in flatlands, under warm and dry conditions. This environment was dominated by open grasslands, with forested areas near rivers and lagoons coming from Northwestern Argentina, the major affinity is with the El Jarillal Member (Chiquimil Formation) and then the Andalhuala Formation (both in Catamarca Province). The Salicas Formation fauna is considered as latest Miocene in age until new fossil discoveries and radioisotopic dates allow a better calibration. The fossil biota and geological data suggests that the Salicas Formation was deposited in flatlands, under warm and dry conditions. This environment was dominated by open grasslands, with forested areas near rivers and lagoons coming from Northwestern Argentina, the major affinity is with the El Jarillal Member (Chiquimil Formation) and then the Andalhuala Formation (both in Catamarca Province). The Salicas Formation fauna is considered as latest Miocene in age until new fossil discoveries and radioisotopic dates allow a better calibration. The fossil biota and geological data suggests that the Salicas Formation was deposited in flatlands, under warm and dry conditions. This environment was dominated by open grasslands, with forested areas near rivers and lagoons coming from Northwestern Argentina, the major affinity is with the El Jarillal Member (Chiquimil Formation) and then the Andalhuala Formation (both in Catamarca Province). The Salicas Formation fauna is considered as latest Miocene in age until new fossil discoveries and radioisotopic dates allow a better calibration. The fossil biota and geological data suggests that the Salicas Formation was deposited in flatlands, under warm and dry conditions. This environment was dominated by open grasslands, with forested areas near rivers and lagoons i.e., La Pampa Province). Among those coming from Northwestern Argentina, the major affinity is with the El Jarillal Member (Chiquimil Formation) and then the Andalhuala Formation (both in Catamarca Province). The Salicas Formation fauna is considered as latest Miocene in age until new fossil discoveries and radioisotopic dates allow a better calibration. The fossil biota and geological data suggests that the Salicas Formation was deposited in flatlands, under warm and dry conditions. This environment was dominated by open grasslands, with forested areas near rivers and lagoons