Corrigendum to “West Africa in Rodinia: High quality paleomagnetic pole from the ~860 Ma Manso dyke swarm (Ghana)” [Gondwana Res. 94 (2021) 28–43] (Gondwana Research (2021) 94 (28–43), (S1342937X2100071X), (10.1016/j.gr.2021.02.010))

ANTONIO, PAUL YVES JEAN; BARATOUX, LENKA; TRINDADE, RICARDO IVAN FERREIRA; ROUSSE, SONIA; AYITE, ANANI; LANA, CRISTIANO; MACOUIN, MÉLINA; ADU, EMMANUEL WILLIAMS KOBBY; SANCHEZ, CAROLINE; SILVA, MARCO ANTÔNIO LEANDRO; FIRMIN, ANNE-SOPHIE; MARTÍNEZ DOPICO, CARMEN IRÈNE; PROIETTI, ARNAUD; AMPONSAH, PRINCE OFORI; SAKYI, PATRICK ASAMOAH

GONDWANA RESEARCH

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV

Año: 2021 vol. 95 p. 10 - 13

1342-937X

The authors would like to correct in the paper published in Gondwana Research (Antonio et al., 2021) the value of the Euler pole used for Amazonia in the proposed reconstruction (Fig. 7), and the name of the AM3 pole used for Amazonia (Table 2). The corrected Fig. 7 and this caption are presented below.The AM3 pole for Amazonia used in this paper for ~1100 Ma (Table 2; Figs. 7 and 8) is not the Rincón del Tigre Complex pole (Patroni, 2015) but the Huanchaca intrusive preliminary pole (SW portion of the Amazonian Craton (Bispo‐Santos et al., 2017) well-dated at 1112 ± 2 Ma (Teixeira et al., 2015). The two corrected sentences where the AM3 pole was cited, and the corrected Table 2 are presented below. ?But, a preliminary ~1112 Ma paleomagnetic pole for the well-dated Huanchaca intrusive preliminary pole (AM3) (Teixeira et al., 2015) supports a moderate to low latitude for Amazonia at that time (Bispo‐Santos et al., 2017), which is incompatible with the model of oblique collision proposed by Tohver et al. (2002).? ?If the magnetization is primary this means the I9 pole (WA1) calculated by Perrin and Prévot (1988) is coeval to the ~1112 Ma Huanchaca intrusive preliminary pole (AM3) from the Amazonia Craton (Bispo‐Santos et al., 2017) (Fig. 7A).? These modifications do not affect any main conclusion of the paper. The authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused.