FIRST RESULTS ON FISH ASSEMBLAGES IN ANEGADA BAY (Argentina)

MOLINA J,M.; LÓPEZ CAZORLA, A.; CUADRADO D.; LLOMPART, F.; COLAUTTI D C.; BAIGÚN, C.; SUQUELE, P.; CALVO, S.; OÑATIBIA, H.

Bahía Blanca

Simposio; Symposium -Estuarine and Coastal Sciences Association (Ecsa 44); 2008

IADO-Estuarine and Coastal Sciences Association

Anegada Bay, located in Buenos Aires, Argentina has an important ecological value due to a great biodiversity in a high environmental complexity. The present study shows preliminary results from the structure of the fish assemblage in the southern region of this bay. The study zone is characterized by a 27-m deep tidal channel where two stations were placed. One is closed to an island on the northern flank, SB, where the bottom sediment is characteristically unconsolidated sand. The other station was placed on the southern flank in Los Pocitos (LP), in the inner part of the bay, where vegetated salt marshes and also consolidated fine-sand sediment is found. The surveys were performed seasonally during December 2007 – May 2008, using gillnets. The frequency of occurrence was estimated for each species. The diversity index (H’) was calculated in order to characterize the fish assemblage and evaluate spatial differences. During the three surveys conducted, 17 species were registered, being Mustelus scmitti, Squatina sp., Odontesthes argentinensis and Cynoscion guatucupa the most frequent (100%). From the total number of species captured, 88% were present in SB and 70% in LP. From the total, 41% appeared only in one site, from which 29% were in SB and the 12% in LP. Diversity showed important spatial differences: LP presents higher H’ values than SB, 1.9 and 1.1 respectively. Those differences can be related with energy difference in the environment. While LP represents a low-energy environment with finer bottom sediments, SB presents unconsolidated sand, a higher energy site. These differences could affect the food supply for fish community species captured, 88% were present in SB and 70% in LP. From the total, 41% appeared only in one site, from which 29% were in SB and the 12% in LP. Diversity showed important spatial differences: LP presents higher H’ values than SB, 1.9 and 1.1 respectively. Those differences can be related with energy difference in the environment. While LP represents a low-energy environment with finer bottom sediments, SB presents unconsolidated sand, a higher energy site. These differences could affect the food supply for fish community argentinensis and Cynoscion guatucupa the most frequent (100%). From the total number of species captured, 88% were present in SB and 70% in LP. From the total, 41% appeared only in one site, from which 29% were in SB and the 12% in LP. Diversity showed important spatial differences: LP presents higher H’ values than SB, 1.9 and 1.1 respectively. Those differences can be related with energy difference in the environment. While LP represents a low-energy environment with finer bottom sediments, SB presents unconsolidated sand, a higher energy site. These differences could affect the food supply for fish community species captured, 88% were present in SB and 70% in LP. From the total, 41% appeared only in one site, from which 29% were in SB and the 12% in LP. Diversity showed important spatial differences: LP presents higher H’ values than SB, 1.9 and 1.1 respectively. Those differences can be related with energy difference in the environment. While LP represents a low-energy environment with finer bottom sediments, SB presents unconsolidated sand, a higher energy site. These differences could affect the food supply for fish community in order to characterize the fish assemblage and evaluate spatial differences. During the three surveys conducted, 17 species were registered, being Mustelus scmitti, Squatina sp., Odontesthes argentinensis and Cynoscion guatucupa the most frequent (100%). From the total number of species captured, 88% were present in SB and 70% in LP. From the total, 41% appeared only in one site, from which 29% were in SB and the 12% in LP. Diversity showed important spatial differences: LP presents higher H’ values than SB, 1.9 and 1.1 respectively. Those differences can be related with energy difference in the environment. While LP represents a low-energy environment with finer bottom sediments, SB presents unconsolidated sand, a higher energy site. These differences could affect the food supply for fish community species captured, 88% were present in SB and 70% in LP. From the total, 41% appeared only in one site, from which 29% were in SB and the 12% in LP. Diversity showed important spatial differences: LP presents higher H’ values than SB, 1.9 and 1.1 respectively. Those differences can be related with energy difference in the environment. While LP represents a low-energy environment with finer bottom sediments, SB presents unconsolidated sand, a higher energy site. These differences could affect the food supply for fish community argentinensis and Cynoscion guatucupa the most frequent (100%). From the total number of species captured, 88% were present in SB and 70% in LP. From the total, 41% appeared only in one site, from which 29% were in SB and the 12% in LP. Diversity showed important spatial differences: LP presents higher H’ values than SB, 1.9 and 1.1 respectively. Those differences can be related with energy difference in the environment. While LP represents a low-energy environment with finer bottom sediments, SB presents unconsolidated sand, a higher energy site. These differences could affect the food supply for fish community species captured, 88% were present in SB and 70% in LP. From the total, 41% appeared only in one site, from which 29% were in SB and the 12% in LP. Diversity showed important spatial differences: LP presents higher H’ values than SB, 1.9 and 1.1 respectively. Those differences can be related with energy difference in the environment. While LP represents a low-energy environment with finer bottom sediments, SB presents unconsolidated sand, a higher energy site. These differences could affect the food supply for fish community H’) was calculated in order to characterize the fish assemblage and evaluate spatial differences. During the three surveys conducted, 17 species were registered, being Mustelus scmitti, Squatina sp., Odontesthes argentinensis and Cynoscion guatucupa the most frequent (100%). From the total number of species captured, 88% were present in SB and 70% in LP. From the total, 41% appeared only in one site, from which 29% were in SB and the 12% in LP. Diversity showed important spatial differences: LP presents higher H’ values than SB, 1.9 and 1.1 respectively. Those differences can be related with energy difference in the environment. While LP represents a low-energy environment with finer bottom sediments, SB presents unconsolidated sand, a higher energy site. These differences could affect the food supply for fish community species captured, 88% were present in SB and 70% in LP. From the total, 41% appeared only in one site, from which 29% were in SB and the 12% in LP. Diversity showed important spatial differences: LP presents higher H’ values than SB, 1.9 and 1.1 respectively. Those differences can be related with energy difference in the environment. While LP represents a low-energy environment with finer bottom sediments, SB presents unconsolidated sand, a higher energy site. These differences could affect the food supply for fish community argentinensis and Cynoscion guatucupa the most frequent (100%). From the total number of species captured, 88% were present in SB and 70% in LP. From the total, 41% appeared only in one site, from which 29% were in SB and the 12% in LP. Diversity showed important spatial differences: LP presents higher H’ values than SB, 1.9 and 1.1 respectively. Those differences can be related with energy difference in the environment. While LP represents a low-energy environment with finer bottom sediments, SB presents unconsolidated sand, a higher energy site. These differences could affect the food supply for fish community species captured, 88% were present in SB and 70% in LP. From the total, 41% appeared only in one site, from which 29% were in SB and the 12% in LP. Diversity showed important spatial differences: LP presents higher H’ values than SB, 1.9 and 1.1 respectively. Those differences can be related with energy difference in the environment. While LP represents a low-energy environment with finer bottom sediments, SB presents unconsolidated sand, a higher energy site. These differences could affect the food supply for fish community Mustelus scmitti, Squatina sp., Odontesthes argentinensis and Cynoscion guatucupa the most frequent (100%). From the total number of species captured, 88% were present in SB and 70% in LP. From the total, 41% appeared only in one site, from which 29% were in SB and the 12% in LP. Diversity showed important spatial differences: LP presents higher H’ values than SB, 1.9 and 1.1 respectively. Those differences can be related with energy difference in the environment. While LP represents a low-energy environment with finer bottom sediments, SB presents unconsolidated sand, a higher energy site. These differences could affect the food supply for fish community species captured, 88% were present in SB and 70% in LP. From the total, 41% appeared only in one site, from which 29% were in SB and the 12% in LP. Diversity showed important spatial differences: LP presents higher H’ values than SB, 1.9 and 1.1 respectively. Those differences can be related with energy difference in the environment. While LP represents a low-energy environment with finer bottom sediments, SB presents unconsolidated sand, a higher energy site. These differences could affect the food supply for fish community and Cynoscion guatucupa the most frequent (100%). From the total number of species captured, 88% were present in SB and 70% in LP. From the total, 41% appeared only in one site, from which 29% were in SB and the 12% in LP. Diversity showed important spatial differences: LP presents higher H’ values than SB, 1.9 and 1.1 respectively. Those differences can be related with energy difference in the environment. While LP represents a low-energy environment with finer bottom sediments, SB presents unconsolidated sand, a higher energy site. These differences could affect the food supply for fish community