Discerning coastal-process signatures and architectural styles in tidal barforms from the deltaic western Paleozoic Gondwana shoreline: new insights about the Balcarce Formation, Argentina

OLIVO, MARIANA S.; ISLA, MANUEL F.; MOYANO-PAZ, DAMIÁN; LÓPEZ, LUCIANO; PERCUDANI, LORENA B.; ZUAZO, JERÓNIMO J.; GÓMEZ-PERAL, LUCÍA E.; POIRÉ, DANIEL G.

JOURNAL OF SEDIMENTARY RESEARCH - (Print)

SEPM-SOC SEDIMENTARY GEOLOGY

Año: 2024 vol. 94 p. 903 - 925

1527-1404

Sedimentological contrasts between coastal to shelf tidal barforms on ancient shorelines, particularly in tidally affected deltas, are relatively poorly understood. A comprehensive analysis of facies distribution and architectural attributes, complemented by virtual outcrop models (VOMs), has unveiled two different tidal barform archetypes in a sand-rich, tide-dominated deltaic succession in the lower Paleozoic Balcarce Formation, Argentina. Barform–channel type 1 comprises single packages of channel-bar units with inclined beds dipping to the N (paleolandward) and S (paleoseaward), composed predominantly of decimeter-scale planar cross-bedded sandstones. These deposits represent laterally migrating tidal bars. Barform–channel type 2, on the other hand, are multiple-stacked packages of sigmoidal inclined strata dipping to the NE (paleolandward) and SW (paleoseaward), consisting of conglomeratic sandstones with meter-scale trough cross-bedding. These strata depict tidal sand ridges exhibiting oblique accretion dynamics. Tidal barform–channel types 1 and 2 are not interspersed laterally and vertically, but they distinguish the lower and upper intervals of the Balcarce Formation. The lower interval shows full tidal control in barform–channel type 1. W-oriented flow of peak tidal currents completely reworked river-derived sediments and built the bar–trough morphology on the subaqueous platform of a tide-dominated delta. In the upper interval, tide- and river-generated facies alternate in barform–channel type 2. In this case, the higher fluvial input prevented complete tidal reworking. Thus, mouth-bar deposits were partially reworked into tidal ridges, which were organized in sandbanks extending across a tide-influenced delta-front setting. A detailed comparison of tidal barform–channel types 1 and 2, together with a comprehensive re-evaluation of previously published basin-scale data, suggests that the coastal sector where Balcarce tidal barforms accumulated likely formed a strait connected to the open ocean to the east-southeast of the study area.The Balcarce Formation shows the evolution of tidal barforms from tide-dominated to tide-influenced delta-front settings. While the distinction between tidal barforms has typically relied on their size attributes, the Balcarce barforms offer novel sedimentological and architectural criteria for distinguishing them in tide-dominated and tide-influenced successions. Moreover, the Balcarce barforms highlight tide-generated sand-rich features, thereby expanding the facies spectrum between mud- and sand-rich tide-modulated deltaic successions for comparisons with other deltaic examples, like those developed in broad sandy shelves or straits.