IADIZA   20886
INSTITUTO ARGENTINO DE INVESTIGACIONES DE LAS ZONAS ARIDAS
Unidad Ejecutora - UE
artículos
Título:
Predicting the environmental niche of the genus Phymaturus: Are palluma and patagonicus groups ecologically differentiated?
Autor/es:
DEBANDI, G.O; CORBALAN, VALERIA; SCOLARO, J.A.; ROIG JUÑENT, SERGIO
Revista:
AUSTRAL ECOLOGY
Editorial:
WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
Referencias:
Año: 2012 vol. 37 p. 392 - 400
ISSN:
1442-9985
Resumen:
The genus Phymaturus (Reptilia: Liolaemidae) is distributed in the mountains and rocky plateaux ofArgentina and Chile and comprises two groups of species, palluma and patagonicus.The two lineages have diverged early in the evolution of the genus and up to today, there is very little geographical overlap between them.We worked with records of localities from the literature, herpetological collections and field data to evaluate habitat suitability of the genus Phymaturus.We used 11 environmental variables to develop environmental niche models (ENMs) for each group within the genus using the Maxent software, and to determine those variables that best explain thedistribution of each group.We also estimated measures of niche similarity using ENMTools to determine whether niche differentiation is real or apparent.The geographical overlap between the groups was very low considering the large geographical range of the genus. Some variables, such as mean annual temperature, soil type and bare soil cover, have a high contribution to the models for both groups. The current niche overlap between Phymaturus groups indicates that the environmental niches of the palluma and patagonicus groups are not equivalent. Based onbackground analysis, we cannot reject the hypothesis that similarity (or divergence) between groups of Phymaturus is no more than expected based on the availability of habitat.The results of this study are a first approximation to the knowledge of the environmental variables associated with the palluma and patagonicus groups, and reveal that the ecological differences found between these groups are more likely due to habitat availability in their respective regions than to differences in habitat preferences.