Plato grammaticus. Sobre el concepto platónico de epistéme en la doctrina del sueño del Teeteto

FABIAN MIE

Areté

Pontificia Universidad Católica de Perú

Lugar: Lima; Año: 2009 vol. 21 p. 167 - 195

1016-913X

fue clásicamente insumida en el elenco de los pioneros de la tesis según la cual el conocimiento debe entenderse como creencia verdadera justificada. Sin embargo, la situación filosófica de este diálogo es más compleja. Me propongo examinar aquí la manera en que Platón presenta a través de la doctrina del sueño — una teoría que exhibe manifiestas similitudes con el atomismo lógico — una discusión acerca de distintas alternativas relativas a la justificación, como estrategia interpretativa para ponderar de qué manera pueden resultar las ideas piezas indispensables de la epistéme. Creo que ello nos conduce tanto a reexaminar seriamente la teoría del conocimiento y la metafísica tradicionalmente adscripta a Platón, a partir de conceptos como los de parte y todo, como también a valorar mejor la posición platónica acerca de cuestiones epistemológicas y semánticas. Creo que ello nos conduce tanto a reexaminar seriamente la teoría del conocimiento y la metafísica tradicionalmente adscripta a Platón, a partir de conceptos como los de parte y todo, como también a valorar mejor la posición platónica acerca de cuestiones epistemológicas y semánticas. Creo que ello nos conduce tanto a reexaminar seriamente la teoría del conocimiento y la metafísica tradicionalmente adscripta a Platón, a partir de conceptos como los de parte y todo, como también a valorar mejor la posición platónica acerca de cuestiones epistemológicas y semánticas. Creo que ello nos conduce tanto a reexaminar seriamente la teoría del conocimiento y la metafísica tradicionalmente adscripta a Platón, a partir de conceptos como los de parte y todo, como también a valorar mejor la posición platónica acerca de cuestiones epistemológicas y semánticas. manera pueden resultar las ideas piezas indispensables de la epistéme. Creo que ello nos conduce tanto a reexaminar seriamente la teoría del conocimiento y la metafísica tradicionalmente adscripta a Platón, a partir de conceptos como los de parte y todo, como también a valorar mejor la posición platónica acerca de cuestiones epistemológicas y semánticas. Creo que ello nos conduce tanto a reexaminar seriamente la teoría del conocimiento y la metafísica tradicionalmente adscripta a Platón, a partir de conceptos como los de parte y todo, como también a valorar mejor la posición platónica acerca de cuestiones epistemológicas y semánticas. Creo que ello nos conduce tanto a reexaminar seriamente la teoría del conocimiento y la metafísica tradicionalmente adscripta a Platón, a partir de conceptos como los de parte y todo, como también a valorar mejor la posición platónica acerca de cuestiones epistemológicas y semánticas. Creo que ello nos conduce tanto a reexaminar seriamente la teoría del conocimiento y la metafísica tradicionalmente adscripta a Platón, a partir de conceptos como los de parte y todo, como también a valorar mejor la posición platónica acerca de cuestiones epistemológicas y semánticas. manera pueden resultar las ideas piezas indispensables de la epistéme. Creo que ello nos conduce tanto a reexaminar seriamente la teoría del conocimiento y la metafísica tradicionalmente adscripta a Platón, a partir de conceptos como los de parte y todo, como también a valorar mejor la posición platónica acerca de cuestiones epistemológicas y semánticas. Creo que ello nos conduce tanto a reexaminar seriamente la teoría del conocimiento y la metafísica tradicionalmente adscripta a Platón, a partir de conceptos como los de parte y todo, como también a valorar mejor la posición platónica acerca de cuestiones epistemológicas y semánticas. Creo que ello nos conduce tanto a reexaminar seriamente la teoría del conocimiento y la metafísica tradicionalmente adscripta a Platón, a partir de conceptos como los de parte y todo, como también a valorar mejor la posición platónica acerca de cuestiones epistemológicas y semánticas. Creo que ello nos conduce tanto a reexaminar seriamente la teoría del conocimiento y la metafísica tradicionalmente adscripta a Platón, a partir de conceptos como los de parte y todo, como también a valorar mejor la posición platónica acerca de cuestiones epistemológicas y semánticas. manera pueden resultar las ideas piezas indispensables de la epistéme. Creo que ello nos conduce tanto a reexaminar seriamente la teoría del conocimiento y la metafísica tradicionalmente adscripta a Platón, a partir de conceptos como los de parte y todo, como también a valorar mejor la posición platónica acerca de cuestiones epistemológicas y semánticas. Creo que ello nos conduce tanto a reexaminar seriamente la teoría del conocimiento y la metafísica tradicionalmente adscripta a Platón, a partir de conceptos como los de parte y todo, como también a valorar mejor la posición platónica acerca de cuestiones epistemológicas y semánticas. Creo que ello nos conduce tanto a reexaminar seriamente la teoría del conocimiento y la metafísica tradicionalmente adscripta a Platón, a partir de conceptos como los de parte y todo, como también a valorar mejor la posición platónica acerca de cuestiones epistemológicas y semánticas. Creo que ello nos conduce tanto a reexaminar seriamente la teoría del conocimiento y la metafísica tradicionalmente adscripta a Platón, a partir de conceptos como los de parte y todo, como también a valorar mejor la posición platónica acerca de cuestiones epistemológicas y semánticas. justificación, como estrategia interpretativa para ponderar de qué manera pueden resultar las ideas piezas indispensables de la epistéme. Creo que ello nos conduce tanto a reexaminar seriamente la teoría del conocimiento y la metafísica tradicionalmente adscripta a Platón, a partir de conceptos como los de parte y todo, como también a valorar mejor la posición platónica acerca de cuestiones epistemológicas y semánticas. Creo que ello nos conduce tanto a reexaminar seriamente la teoría del conocimiento y la metafísica tradicionalmente adscripta a Platón, a partir de conceptos como los de parte y todo, como también a valorar mejor la posición platónica acerca de cuestiones epistemológicas y semánticas. Creo que ello nos conduce tanto a reexaminar seriamente la teoría del conocimiento y la metafísica tradicionalmente adscripta a Platón, a partir de conceptos como los de parte y todo, como también a valorar mejor la posición platónica acerca de cuestiones epistemológicas y semánticas. Creo que ello nos conduce tanto a reexaminar seriamente la teoría del conocimiento y la metafísica tradicionalmente adscripta a Platón, a partir de conceptos como los de parte y todo, como también a valorar mejor la posición platónica acerca de cuestiones epistemológicas y semánticas. ideas piezas indispensables de la epistéme. Creo que ello nos conduce tanto a reexaminar seriamente la teoría del conocimiento y la metafísica tradicionalmente adscripta a Platón, a partir de conceptos como los de parte y todo, como también a valorar mejor la posición platónica acerca de cuestiones epistemológicas y semánticas. Theaetetus´ third definition of epistéme was traditionally understood as a precursor of the so called Justified True Belief Knowledge-Model. Nevertheless, Plato´s point in the last section of the dialogue is much more complex than this classification makes suppose. In order to offer an interpretation of the problem of justification in the Theaetetus I will here examine why and how Plato develops such a strange doctrine as the Dream-theory is. This is my strategy to show that Plato´s Theaetetus is aiming at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. strange doctrine as the Dream-theory is. This is my strategy to show that Plato´s Theaetetus is aiming at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. strange doctrine as the Dream-theory is. This is my strategy to show that Plato´s Theaetetus is aiming at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. strange doctrine as the Dream-theory is. This is my strategy to show that Plato´s Theaetetus is aiming at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. Justified True Belief Knowledge-Model. Nevertheless, Plato´s point in the last section of the dialogue is much more complex than this classification makes suppose. In order to offer an interpretation of the problem of justification in the Theaetetus I will here examine why and how Plato develops such a strange doctrine as the Dream-theory is. This is my strategy to show that Plato´s Theaetetus is aiming at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. strange doctrine as the Dream-theory is. This is my strategy to show that Plato´s Theaetetus is aiming at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. strange doctrine as the Dream-theory is. This is my strategy to show that Plato´s Theaetetus is aiming at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. strange doctrine as the Dream-theory is. This is my strategy to show that Plato´s Theaetetus is aiming at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. Justified True Belief Knowledge-Model. Nevertheless, Plato´s point in the last section of the dialogue is much more complex than this classification makes suppose. In order to offer an interpretation of the problem of justification in the Theaetetus I will here examine why and how Plato develops such a strange doctrine as the Dream-theory is. This is my strategy to show that Plato´s Theaetetus is aiming at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. strange doctrine as the Dream-theory is. This is my strategy to show that Plato´s Theaetetus is aiming at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. strange doctrine as the Dream-theory is. This is my strategy to show that Plato´s Theaetetus is aiming at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. strange doctrine as the Dream-theory is. This is my strategy to show that Plato´s Theaetetus is aiming at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. Justified True Belief Knowledge-Model. Nevertheless, Plato´s point in the last section of the dialogue is much more complex than this classification makes suppose. In order to offer an interpretation of the problem of justification in the Theaetetus I will here examine why and how Plato develops such a strange doctrine as the Dream-theory is. This is my strategy to show that Plato´s Theaetetus is aiming at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. strange doctrine as the Dream-theory is. This is my strategy to show that Plato´s Theaetetus is aiming at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. strange doctrine as the Dream-theory is. This is my strategy to show that Plato´s Theaetetus is aiming at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. strange doctrine as the Dream-theory is. This is my strategy to show that Plato´s Theaetetus is aiming at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. ´ third definition of epistéme was traditionally understood as a precursor of the so called Justified True Belief Knowledge-Model. Nevertheless, Plato´s point in the last section of the dialogue is much more complex than this classification makes suppose. In order to offer an interpretation of the problem of justification in the Theaetetus I will here examine why and how Plato develops such a strange doctrine as the Dream-theory is. This is my strategy to show that Plato´s Theaetetus is aiming at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. strange doctrine as the Dream-theory is. This is my strategy to show that Plato´s Theaetetus is aiming at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. strange doctrine as the Dream-theory is. This is my strategy to show that Plato´s Theaetetus is aiming at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. strange doctrine as the Dream-theory is. This is my strategy to show that Plato´s Theaetetus is aiming at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. Theaetetus I will here examine why and how Plato develops such a strange doctrine as the Dream-theory is. This is my strategy to show that Plato´s Theaetetus is aiming at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contributions on epistemological and semantic issues. Theaetetus is aiming at proving that the forms are necessary tools to justify true beliefs and, consequently, to define what is knowledge. Taking some achievements about what should be the complex character of the objects of knowledge, we will be moved to reconsider seriously what is Plato´s theory of knowledge and metaphysics as well as to understand some of Plato´s contr