JELIN elizabeth
capítulos de libros
Victims, Relatives, and Citizens in Argentina: Whose Voice Is Legitimate Enough?
Humanitarianism and Suffering: The Mobilization of Empathy
Cambridge University Press
Lugar: Cambrdige; Año: 2009; p. 177 - 201
<!-- /* Font Definitions */ @font-face {font-family:"Cambria Math"; panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:roman; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:-1610611985 1107304683 0 0 415 0;} @font-face {font-family:Garamond; panose-1:2 2 4 4 3 3 1 1 8 3; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:roman; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:647 0 0 0 159 0;} /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-unhide:no; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";} .MsoChpDefault {mso-style-type:export-only; mso-default-props:yes; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;} @page Section1 {size:8.5in 11.0in; margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in; mso-header-margin:.5in; mso-footer-margin:.5in; mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} --> Argentina is a case where the variety of innovations and initiatives regarding ways to deal with the past of political violence and State terrorism has been extremely wide and path-setting for the international community.  In spite of the diversity of institutionally sanctioned responses, personal experience of victimhood and survival, as well as kinship-based relationships to victims, have become the criteria for legitimation of voice regarding both State sponsored and socially promoted political, cultural and social activities?perhaps in detriment of other more universal and citizenship-based criteria. Furthermore, this preeminence may work against the need, in periods of political transition, of building a wide political community of citizens.   To develop these ideas, I will take up first the place of ?familism? in the politics of memory in Argentina during the last thirty years, since the military coup of 1976. Yet the historical path followed in the country is not a linear one; in fact there have been many junctures in which significant shifts of direction took place. In fact, it was during the dictatorship (1976-1983) that the ?familistic? interpretive framework was developed. Afterwards, in the initial stage of post-dictatorship, institutional settings took the leading place. The trials of the military (in 1985) actually meant the transformation of the voice of victims into that of citizens with rights. Afterwards, the familial and genetic bond regained center stage, as expressed in the important struggle that the organization of Grandmothers (Abuelas de Plaza de Mayo) developed to restore stolen identities of kidnapped children. Thirty years after the military coup, the testimonial voice of political militancy and survival still operates in the political arena, implying further legitimacy of the voice of victims. The successive instances presented will allow then to unfold the dilemmas that Argentine society faces in the attempt to broaden and deepen equality and citizenship.