Echoes from the Miocene: tracing the anatomy and phylogeny of Prosqualodon australis (Cetacea: Odontoceti)

GAETÁN, CARLOS MAXIMILIANO; BUONO, MÓNICA ROMINA; TANAKA, YOSHIHIRO; FARRONI, NICOLAS; MILANO, VIVIANA NATALIA

JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC PALAEONTOLOGY

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS

Lugar: Cambridge; Año: 2025 vol. 23

1477-2019

Odontocetes compose the most ecologically and taxonomically diverse clade of marine mammals.All modern odontocetes are homodont, but the early history of this group (Oligocene–Early Miocene) was dominated by a variety of bizarre forms with archaic features. Among these archaic odontocetes was Prosqualodon australis, a medium-sized, brevirostrine species from the Early Miocene of Patagonia (Argentina). It was originally described based on a partial skull; however, extensive fieldwork in Early Miocene outcrops in Patagonia has yielded several new specimens, including skulls with well-preserved basicranium, ear bones and postcranium. Based on this broad new sample we provide an updated anatomical description and phylogenetic analysis of P. australis and discuss other referred specimens to the species. We also perform a taxonomic revision of the other two species of the genus, P. davidis (Australia) and ‘P. hamiltoni* (New Zealand). Our studies confirmed the phylogenetic position of P. australis as an early-diverging (i.e., stem) odontocete and add diagnostic characters from the basicranium and periotic to the already known features that define P. australis: presence of a triangular-shaped parafalciform fossa, and a narrow and deep furrow that originates from the periotic fossa and is anteromedially blind, periotic with a promontorial groove associated with an anteroventral tubercle and well-developed dorsal crest. Most anatomical differences between P. australis and the holotype of P. davidis are interpreted as ontogenetic variation, suggesting that P. davidis is a junior synonym of P. australis, making it the first circumpolar odontocete species from the Southern Hemisphere. Conversely, the anatomical and phylogenetic differences between P. australis and ‘P. hamiltoni* suggest that these taxa are not congeneric.The results of our work provide, for the first time, a thorough anatomical and systematic revision of the genus Prosqualodon, focusing on P. australis, based on one of the most outstanding fossil odontocete samples.