INVESTIGADORES
MARTINEZ PASTUR Guillermo Jose
artículos
Título:
Knowledge arising from long-term research of variable retention harvesting in Tierra del Fuego: where do we go from here?
Autor/es:
MARTÍNEZ PASTUR, GUILLERMO J.; ROSAS, YAMINA M.; TORO MANRÍQUEZ, MÓNICA; HUERTAS HERRERA, ALEJANDRO; MILLER, JUAN A.; CELLINI, JUAN M.; BARRERA, MARCELO D.; PERI, PABLO L.; LENCINAS, MARÍA V.
Revista:
Ecological Processes
Editorial:
Springer
Referencias:
Lugar: Amsterdam; Año: 2019 vol. 8 p. 24 - 24
Resumen:
Nothofagus pumilio forests in Tierra del Fuego are the southernmost forests in the world, where extreme climateconditions represent a challenge to attain sustainable forest management. Retention forestry was proposed as analternative to increase the species conservation in managed stands. Here, we synthetized results related to theimplementation of a variable retention harvesting based on a combination of aggregate patches and dispersedretention during the last 18 years comparing with other silviculture proposals (e.g., shelterwood cuts) and controltreatments (primary unmanaged forests). We summarized the results for (i) sawmill operations, (ii) timber yield, (iii)overstory stability, (iv) forest structure, (v) microclimate and natural cycles, (vi) natural regeneration dynamics(flowering, seeding, foraging, recruitment, growth, and mortality), and (vii) biodiversity (mammals, understory plants,mistletoes, birds, arthropods, mosses, lichens, and fungi). In general, aggregate patches maintained forest structureand micro-environmental variables, and slightly increased biodiversity and forest reproduction variables comparedto unmanaged primary forests. On the contrary, dispersed retention decreased forest structure variables and greatlyincreased biodiversity (richness and abundance) when it was compared to unmanaged primary forests. Ecologicalconditions are influenced by variable retention harvesting, but direction and magnitude of the effect depend anddiffer according to retention types. Besides this, biodiversity taxa greatly differed among groups depending onretention types. In general, the species assemblages in aggregate patches were similar to those found in primaryunmanaged forests, while they were significantly modified in the dispersed retention. This occurred due to (i) localextinction of some original species, (ii) the introduction of native species from the surrounding environments, or (iii)the invasion of exotic species. This silvicultural method has been a useful tool to conserve biodiversity andecosystem functions, approaching to the balance between economy, ecology, and social requirements in themanaged areas.