INVESTIGADORES
FREIDIN Esteban
artículos
Título:
Devaluation of low-quality food during early experience by sheep
Autor/es:
CATANESE, F.; FREIDIN, E.; CUELLO, M.I.; DISTEL, R.A.
Revista:
ANIMAL
Editorial:
CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
Referencias:
Año: 2011 vol. 5 p. 938 - 942
ISSN:
1751-7311
Resumen:
Ruminant’s early experience with low-quality food (LQF) is expected to increase its acceptance and preference in adulthood. Contrarily, we found that experienced sheep (ES) exposed to mature oat hay early in life ate less of this LQF than inexperienced sheep (IS) (Catanese et al., 2010). A possibility is that ES might have devaluated the LQF through continuous comparisons against highly-quality food (HQF) supplements (sunflower meal and ground corn) that were simultaneously available during early experience. In the present study we tested the devaluation hypothesis with a Successive Negative Contrast (SNC) procedure. In a consummatory SNC procedure, “shift” subjects are unexpectedly changed from HQF to LQF, and their consumption is then compared against consumption of “unshift” subjects which receive LQF all throughout the SNC procedure. The magnitude of the difference in consumption between preshift and postshift is regarded as a measure of the degree to which both foods (HQF and LQF) are perceived to differ hedonically. When sheep from our previous study were 300 days old, both ES and IS were randomly assigned to either shift (ES-S and IS-S) or unshift conditions (ES-U and IS-U) (n=6 in each group). Groups ES-S and IS-S were fed HQF (alfalfa hay) during the preshift phase, and then suddenly changed to LQF (oat hay) in the postshift phase. Groups ES-U and IS-U (controls) were fed only LQF throughout the SNC procedure. Subjects in ES-S showed a significantly lower intake of LQF than those in ES-U in the first postshift session (i.e. they showed a SNC effect), which was not observed in IS. These results agree with ES subjects having devalued LQF during early experience. We discuss the possibility that high levels of nutrient supplementation can result in devaluation of LQF (i,e., decrease on preference and acceptance), whereas restricted levels of supplementation may promote a positive experience with LQF.