CONICET | Buscador de Institutos y Recursos Humanos

There are three basic positions about how many correct logics there are: monism, pluralism and nihilism. These are, presumably, exclusive points of view. Here, we will defend that nihilism is compatible with both monism and pluralism. For that purpose, we will present a series of increasingly empty logics. Every one of them validates not only no inference?as TS?, but also no metainference of any level. But the last two have also no antivalidities whatsoever, and the very last one also have no contingencies neither. In order to achieve these goals, these logics distinguish the validity-standard from other standards.