INVESTIGADORES
ALVAREZ Luis Ignacio
artículos
Título:
Development and evaluation of an anatomically designed and 3D printed device to enhance orotracheal intubation success in rabbits by inexperienced veterinarians
Autor/es:
NEJAMKIN, PABLO; CLAUSSE, MARÍA; LANDIVAR, FLORENCIA; LORENZUTTI, MATÍAS A.; CAVILLA, VERÓNICA; VIVIANI, PAULA; ALVAREZ, LUIS I.; DEL SOLE, MARÍA J.
Revista:
VETERINARY ANAESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA
Editorial:
WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
Referencias:
Año: 2023 vol. 50 p. 273 - 279
ISSN:
1467-2987
Resumen:
Objective: To assess whether the use of a three-dimensional (3D) printed device enhances the success rate of orotracheal intubation in rabbits. Study design: Prospective, crossover randomized controlled trial. Animals: A total of six mixed-breed rabbits. Methods: A device to guide the endotracheal tube was designed based on computed tomography images and then manufactured using 3D printing. Rabbits were randomly assigned for intubation by two inexperienced veterinarians using the blind (BLI), borescope- (BOR) or device- (DEV) guided techniques. Success rate, number of attempts, time to success, injury scores and propofol dose were recorded and compared. Significance was considered when p < 0.05. Results: Success rate was higher in DEV (58.3%) than in BLI (8.3%) (p < 0.023), but not different from that in BOR (41.6%). Total time until successful intubation was lower in DEV (45 ± 23 seconds) and BOR (85 ± 62 seconds) than in BLI (290 seconds; p < 0.006). Time for the successful attempt was lower for DEV (35 ± 10 seconds) and BOR (74 ± 43 seconds) than in BLI (290 seconds; p < 0.0001). The propofol dose required was lower for DEV (2.3 ± 1.2 mg kg–1) than for BLI (3.4 ± 1.6 mg kg–1) (p < 0.031), but not different from BOR (2.4 ± 0.9 mg kg–1). Number of attempts and oxygen desaturation events were not different among techniques (p < 0.051 and p < 0.326, respectively). Injury scores [median (range)] before and after attempts were different in BLI [0 versus 1 (0–3), p < 0.005] and BOR [0 (0–1) versus 1 (0–3), p < 0.002] but not in DEV [0 (0–2) versus 0 (0–3), p < 0.109]. Conclusions and clinical relevance: The device facilitated orotracheal intubation with a time similar to the borescope-guided technique but faster than the traditional blind technique.