PROBIEN   20416
INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACION Y DESARROLLO EN INGENIERIA DE PROCESOS, BIOTECNOLOGIA Y ENERGIAS ALTERNATIVAS
Unidad Ejecutora - UE
congresos y reuniones científicas
Título:
Pichia membranifaciens as spoilage yeast in Patagonian wines: isolation, origin and volatile phenols production
Autor/es:
SAEZ, J.; LOPES, C.A.; KIRS VERONICA; SANGORRÍN, M.P.
Lugar:
Córdoba. Argentina
Reunión:
Congreso; VI Congreso Argentino de Microbiología General,; 2009
Resumen:
<!-- /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-parent:""; margin:0cm; margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";} @page Section1 {size:595.3pt 841.9pt; margin:71.9pt 3.0cm 53.95pt 3.0cm; mso-header-margin:35.4pt; mso-footer-margin:35.4pt; mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} -->   Yeasts belonging to the species Dekkera bruxellensis have long been associated with serious economic damages in winemaking due to its ability to grow and to produce phenolic compounds. In order to evaluate the potential contamination of two wines, different yeast isolation protocols were evaluated. Wine samples were filtered using 0.2 µm pore size membranes and subsequently seeded in two selective agar media: A (GPY+cicloheximide+ampicillin) and B (GPY+ CaCO3 +ampicillin). Alicuots of the same wines were inoculated into two selective liquid media: C (yeast extract+glucose+NO3K+ampicillin) and D (YNB+glucose+cicloheximida+ampicillin). After incubation at 26ºC, yeast cultures were isolated in the same (A and B) solid media. Yeast colonies from each wine were selected according with their macroscopic features and frequencies and identified by ITS1-5.8S rDNA-ITS2 PCR-RFLP analysis.  Only two yeast species (Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Pichia membranifaciens) were detected in both wines using three out of four different media. In medium A only S. cerevisiae colonies were observed. Because P. membranifaciens has been related to food spoilage, we evaluated the spoilage potential of our isolates (production of volatile phenols in wine). We also evaluated the possible source of contamination (vineyard or cellar surfaces). Healthy and damaged grapes located in both shadowed and sunny vineyard areas were sampled before harvest in the same familiar cellar. Samples from 13 fermentation vats and filters were obtained by streaking with sterile cotton plugs and incubation using selective liquid medium. After growth, samples were seeded in the same solid media and identified. Hanseniaspora uvarum and Zygoascus hellenicus were detected in both healthy and damaged grapes from sunny areas; the same two species as well as iPichia guilliermondii were isolated from damaged grapes in the shadow and only H. uvarum in healthy grapes in the shadow. Thirty-eight percent of the samples from vat surfaces did not showed yeast isolates; however, 62% evidenced the presence of Candida boidinii and the species P. guilliermondii, Rhodotorula mucilaginosa and H. uvarum were only detected one vat each. The only species detected in filters was P. membranifaciens. The intraspecific characterization of the P. membranifaciens isolates by mtDNA-RFLP demonstrated that a same strain was detected in both vines and filter. Finally, the capacity of producing volatile phenols by different P. membranifaciens isolates was evaluated by HPLC in laboratory scale fermentations using sterile wine added with the precursor p-coumaric acid (100 mg/L). Average values of 0,6 mg/L of 4-etilphenol and 2,7 mg/L of 4-vinilphenol were detected, evidencing for the first time the capacity of this yeast species to produce these compounds in wine conditions.