Learned olfactory cues affect pollen-foraging preferences in honeybees.

ARENAS, ANDRÉS; FARINA WM

ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD

Año: 2011

0003-3472

Honeybees, Apis mellifera, show learned odour preferences for flowers that provide nectar as a reward.However, little is known about such behavioural plasticity when bees exploit pollen sources. Furthermore,the question about whether nectar and pollen foragers use the same learned strategy to improveforaging efficiency remains untested. Here, we demonstrate that honeybee foragers are able to learnodour cues associated with pollen as a reward. This was tested in free-flying bees in a dual-choicefeeding device after the bees had gathered pollen from a scented feeder. Free-flying bees that associatedodour with pollen successfully recalled these memories in olfactometer odour choice tests ina Y-maze, but they failed to show extension of the proboscis to learned odour cues when restrained(proboscis extension reflex, PER, assay). In addition, odour cues associated with pollen at the feeding siteinduced foraging reactivation when bees were blown into the hive. In PER assays, after fatty acids wereapplied to the bees’ antennae, pollen foragers were more responsive than nectar foragers. This, in turn,allowed pollen foragers in the PER assay to associate an odour cue with pollen in some trials. On theother hand, the unconditioned response (UR) and the odour-conditioned response (CR) to sucrose andamino acids were similar for both types of foragers. Pollen foragers also showed more URs to fresh pollenof different flower species and even performed better during conditioning with some pollen types as thereward than did nectar foragers. By studying biases in pollen-foraging responses after learning, weprovide new insights to help comprehend and characterize the search for food between pollen andnonpollen honeybee foragers.