CERELA 05438
CENTRO DE REFERENCIA PARA LACTOBACILOS
Unidad Ejecutora - UE
artículos
Título:
Effects of probiotic administration in swine
Autor/es:
ROSS, G.R.; GUSILS, C.; OLISZEWSKI, R.; COLOMBO DE HOLGADO, S.; OLISZEWSKI, R. GONZ¨¢LEZZ SSNN P¨¦REZ CHAIAIA, A
Revista:
JOURNAL OF BIOSCIENCE AND BIOENGINEERING
Editorial:
SOC BIOSCIENCE BIOENGINEERING JAPAN
Referencias:
Lugar: Osaka, Japon; Año: 2010 vol. 109 p. 545 - 549
ISSN:
1389-1723
Resumen:
In the present work we evaluated the effects of probiotic strains administration in pigs. On the 35th day of age, 30 pigs
were distributed into 2 groups: the non-treated control group (initial average BW: 8.3¡À0.6 kg) and a probiotic supplemented
fed group (initial average BW: 8.7¡À0.4 kg). Each experimental group was fed ad libitum on a commercial diet with free access
to tap water for 35 days. A mixed probiotic culture (108 CFU/ml) was orally delivered, every day, to the animals of the probiotic
supplemented fed group. Body weight (BW), feed intake (FI), efficiency (BW: Feed), and faecal microflora, were studied before
and throughout the experimental trial. At the end of the fifth week, 5 animals of each dietary treatment were slaughtered and
intestinal samples were taken for histology. The results obtained showed that the group receiving probiotic bacteria exhibited
lower FI values and better efficiency than control group (P¡Ü0.05), but mean final BW values were not significantly different.
Only significant changes (P¡Ü0.05) were found in enterobacteria population between control and probiotic supplemented fed
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
Only significant changes (P¡Ü0.05) were found in enterobacteria population between control and probiotic supplemented fed
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
Only significant changes (P¡Ü0.05) were found in enterobacteria population between control and probiotic supplemented fed
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
Only significant changes (P¡Ü0.05) were found in enterobacteria population between control and probiotic supplemented fed
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
Only significant changes (P¡Ü0.05) were found in enterobacteria population between control and probiotic supplemented fed
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
Only significant changes (P¡Ü0.05) were found in enterobacteria population between control and probiotic supplemented fed
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
Only significant changes (P¡Ü0.05) were found in enterobacteria population between control and probiotic supplemented fed
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
supplemented fed group. Body weight (BW), feed intake (FI), efficiency (BW: Feed), and faecal microflora, were studied before
and throughout the experimental trial. At the end of the fifth week, 5 animals of each dietary treatment were slaughtered and
intestinal samples were taken for histology. The results obtained showed that the group receiving probiotic bacteria exhibited
lower FI values and better efficiency than control group (P¡Ü0.05), but mean final BW values were not significantly different.
Only significant changes (P¡Ü0.05) were found in enterobacteria population between control and probiotic supplemented fed
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
Only significant changes (P¡Ü0.05) were found in enterobacteria population between control and probiotic supplemented fed
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
Only significant changes (P¡Ü0.05) were found in enterobacteria population between control and probiotic supplemented fed
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
Only significant changes (P¡Ü0.05) were found in enterobacteria population between control and probiotic supplemented fed
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
Only significant changes (P¡Ü0.05) were found in enterobacteria population between control and probiotic supplemented fed
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
Only significant changes (P¡Ü0.05) were found in enterobacteria population between control and probiotic supplemented fed
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
Only significant changes (P¡Ü0.05) were found in enterobacteria population between control and probiotic supplemented fed
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
supplemented fed group. Body weight (BW), feed intake (FI), efficiency (BW: Feed), and faecal microflora, were studied before
and throughout the experimental trial. At the end of the fifth week, 5 animals of each dietary treatment were slaughtered and
intestinal samples were taken for histology. The results obtained showed that the group receiving probiotic bacteria exhibited
lower FI values and better efficiency than control group (P¡Ü0.05), but mean final BW values were not significantly different.
Only significant changes (P¡Ü0.05) were found in enterobacteria population between control and probiotic supplemented fed
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
Only significant changes (P¡Ü0.05) were found in enterobacteria population between control and probiotic supplemented fed
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
Only significant changes (P¡Ü0.05) were found in enterobacteria population between control and probiotic supplemented fed
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
this study could be used widespread as a way to improve growth performance parameters of animals avoiding the use of
antibiotics as growth-promoting factors.
group during the experimental period. By histological techniques it was observed that the treatment group has intestinal
morphological structures more preserved than control group. These results suggest that probiotic bacteria administrated in
