Recommendations regarding the requirements and applications for long-term recordings in epilepsy

DEMETRIOS VELIS, PERRINE PLOUIN, JEAN GOTMAN, GIORGIO BATTAGLIA, BRIAN LITT, BERNARD RENAULT, KLAUS LENNERTZ, DEMETRIOS VELIS, SYLVIA KOCHEN, PERRINE PLOUIN, NOBUKAZU NAKASATO, FERNANDO LOPES DA SILVA

EPILEPSIA

Año: 2007 vol. 48 p. 379 - 384

0013-9580

The purpose of this paper is to update the state of knowledge with respect to Long-term monitoring (LTM) in epilepsy and to formulate recommendations regarding the application of LTM in clinical practice. LTM is an established technique in use both in a hospital setting (2, 6,12,16,19,48) and, increasingly, in an ambulatory and more recently in a community-based setting (22,46).  There has been sufficient evidence to substantiate the claim that LTM is of crucial importance in documenting electroclinical correlations both in epilepsy and in paroxysmally occurring behavioural changes often mistaken for epilepsy (21-23). Internationally recognized neurophysiological equipment standards, data acquisition and data transfer protocols and widely accepted safety standards have made widespread access to LTM facilities in epilepsy possible (30, 40, 49).  Recommendations on efficient and effective use of resources as well as regarding training and competencies for personnel involved in LTM in epilepsy have been formulated (3,5-9,16,19).  The DMC Neurophysiology Subcommittee of the ILAE recommends use of hospital-based LTM in the documentation of seizures including its application for assessing seizure type and frequency, in the evaluation of status epilepticus, in non-invasive and invasive video/EEG investigations for epilepsy surgery and for the differential diagnosis between epilepsy and paroxysmally occurring nonepileptic conditions, in children and in adults.  Ambulatory out-patient and community-based LTM may be used as a substitute for in-patient LTM in cases where the latter is not cost-effective or feasible or when activation procedures aimed at increasing seizure yield are not indicated. However, outpatient ambulatory monitoring may be less informative than is inpatient monitoring in some cases because: 1. reduction of medication to provoke seizures may not be safe as an outpatient; 2. faulty electrode contacts cannot quickly be noticed and repaired; 3. the patient may move out of video surveillance; 4. duration of ambulatory monitoring can be limited by technical constraints.