INGEBI   02650
INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACIONES EN INGENIERIA GENETICA Y BIOLOGIA MOLECULAR "DR. HECTOR N TORRES"
Unidad Ejecutora - UE
libros
Título:
Scientific Assessment on ozone Depletion 2010. Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project–Report No. 52
Autor/es:
AYITÉ-LÔ NOHENDE AJAVON; PAUL A. NEWMAN; JOHN A. PYLE; A.R. RAVISHANKARA
Editorial:
World Meteorological Organization
Referencias:
Lugar: Ginebra; Año: 2011 p. 516
ISSN:
9966-7319-6-2
Resumen:
Se ha incluido en Producción Científica, ya que en este item (LIBROS) se incluye como ROL la REVISION (VER MAS ARRIBA).  El proceso de revision lleva varias etapas, desde draft 0 hasta el documento final (draft 2). Solo se adjunta el texto completo del prefacio, el libro completo (516 pags) puede consultarse en el URL consignado. Como autores, solo se consignaron los Co-Chairs, ya que el total del libro involucra a cientos de científicos. The present document will be part of the information upon which the Parties to the United Nations Montreal Protocol will base their future decisions regarding protection of the stratospheric ozone layer. . To meet this request, the Scientific Assessment Panel prepared, about every 3-4 years, major assessment reports that updated the state of understanding  and its purviews. These reports are prepared by the world’s leading experts in the atmospheric sciences and under the international auspices of the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) and/or the United Nations Environment Programme UNEP). The formal planning of the current assessment was started early in 2009. The Cochairs considered suggestions from the Parties regarding experts from their countries who could participate in the process. Furthermore, an ad hoc international scientific advisory group also suggested participants from the world scientific community. The first drafts of the chapters were examined at a meeting that occurred on 17–19 November 2009 in Fairfax, Virginia, United States, at which the Coordinating Lead Authors, Cochairs, and a small group of international experts focused on the scientific content of the draft chapters. The second drafts of the chapters were reviewed by 122 scientists worldwide in a mail peer review. In some cases co-authors of one chapter acted as reviewer for others, and in other cases, reviewers not involved as authors were consulted. The comments of the reviwers were considered by the authors. At a Panel Review Meeting in Les Diablerets, Switzerland, held on 28 June–2 July 2010, the responses to these mail review comments were proposed by the authors and discussed by the 74 participants. Final changes to the chapters were decided upon at this meeting.